Racketen spam in the team games. A bit problematic.
Posts: 3053
Also why would you play brits rn? They suck and have nothing redeeming about them as a faction except commandos.
Posts: 5279
Now that they have almost the same range as other at guns and have an extra man, I don't really see why they still have retreat. Why they need it more than any other AT gun is beyond me and having it just makes it easier to play really risky with them and not be punished for it at all.
Also why would you play brits rn? They suck and have nothing redeeming about them as a faction except commandos.
Raks are still 5 range less than other AT guns and also lack a gun shield. The cover from the shield is bugged but applying sometimes is better than never and also the gun shield sometimes eats tank shells.
Posts: 281
thats not a katy anymore
apart from this i see no way how you can prevent infantry from retreating after the first salvo. Even if you increase the damage they will still retreat if any capable player is playing.
Posts: 281
Raks are still 5 range less than other AT guns and also lack a gun shield. The cover from the shield is bugged but applying sometimes is better than never and also the gun shield sometimes eats tank shells.
how about make the range same and decrease cost than normal At gun to compensaate for o buggy shield? but retreat has to go at this range/
Posts: 5279
how about make the range same and decrease cost than normal At gun to compensaate for o buggy shield? but retreat has to go at this range/
It already costs less than a normal AT gun. It's fine as is now that it can't creep. It's less good at killing tanks but more good at surviving. Given the price of okw armour that's OK.
Posts: 255
Permanently BannedPosts: 888
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Other than that it could use faster reaction times and a veterancy overhaul.
Posts: 4474
Posts: 960
U know guys u are totally right , let's fix it by giving , from codguy opinion, the" worst" at gun in the game , the usf one
I support this idea.
The RAK right now is pretty bad. Just take the Pak40 model and give it M1 stats/prices, and it fixes everything.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
I think they should mostly just revert the Raketen back to what it was with the exception of removing it's cloak while moving and maybe taking 10 MP off it's cost to compensate.
Rak back to 50 range instead of 55, 4 men instead of 5, and 260mp instead of 270mp.
When’s this clown getting banned?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Rak back to 50 range instead of 55, 4 men instead of 5, and 260mp instead of 270mp.
When’s this clown getting banned?
For the Force to stay in balance, mrgame and ullu would have to go as well, or all 3 need to stay.
That being said, new rak is much more reliable and incomparably less cheesy then original one, while still retaining retreat. Its L2P issue, regardless which side of the rak you are on.
Posts: 888
Rak back to 50 range instead of 55, 4 men instead of 5, and 260mp instead of 270mp.
When’s this clown getting banned?
Well we can't all be Third Reich aficionados.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Well we can't all be Third Reich aficionados.
1v1 me. I’ll play allies.
Livestreams
3 | |||||
4 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.921405.695+5
- 5.634229.735+8
- 6.276108.719+27
- 7.306114.729+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.1045675.608+3
- 10.722440.621+4
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
7 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, fitena
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM