Login

russian armor

Give USF an intermediate AT

8 Nov 2019, 00:06 AM
#61
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Nov 2019, 23:11 PMLago
I think reworking the Stuart is the way to go. It's a really odd unit that utterly dumpsters T2 Ostheer but is pretty much useless against anything bigger.

Making it fill a niche like the SU-76 (good against mediums in pairs or with a Sherman, doesn't utterly dumpster LVs) would then give you some space to specialise the Jackson.


Not sure how you can make the Stuart a medium counter tho. Both the su76 and Puma out range to make up for the lack of durability. I don't see how to make the stewie able to fill the role without a huge redesign that could consume its identity
8 Nov 2019, 00:21 AM
#62
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

Not sure how you can make the Stuart a medium counter tho. Both the su76 and Puma out range to make up for the lack of durability. I don't see how to make the stewie able to fill the role without a huge redesign that could consume its identity


The Stuart's identity was consumed long ago: it's now a bad AEC with high armour and janky maneuverability.

As for how you'd rework it? Make it more like the AEC: slash the armour, improve the gun, give it some new, less janky abilities.
8 Nov 2019, 01:42 AM
#63
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Nov 2019, 00:21 AMLago


The Stuart's identity was consumed long ago: it's now a bad AEC with high armour and janky maneuverability.

As for how you'd rework it? Make it more like the AEC: slash the armour, improve the gun, give it some new, less janky abilities.

Yea but even the AEC isn't really the intermediate AT THE OP is looking for. It's not particularly viable to be your main medium AT. Support sure, but not something like the puma or su76 or even stug. That's what I'm getting at.
8 Nov 2019, 01:46 AM
#64
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3



Not sure how you can make the Stuart a medium counter tho. Both the su76 and Puma out range to make up for the lack of durability. I don't see how to make the stewie able to fill the role without a huge redesign that could consume its identity


Stuart shouldn’t be a medium counter.

Buff up the AAHT’s pen a bit and stick it in LT tier. Perfect AT for LT.
Nerf the Stuart’s AT to the ground, give it sight mode, vehicle capping and HE shells then stick it in Captain tier as the perfect T70 clone but without the OPness. The tier has AT guns.
8 Nov 2019, 06:29 AM
#65
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1



Stuart shouldn’t be a medium counter.

Buff up the AAHT’s pen a bit and stick it in LT tier. Perfect AT for LT.
Nerf the Stuart’s AT to the ground, give it sight mode, vehicle capping and HE shells then stick it in Captain tier as the perfect T70 clone but without the OPness. The tier has AT guns.


Literally none of this is needed. The US doesn't need any help killing infantry, and buffing the AAHT penetration would do absolutely nothing. It's already good against all lights, anything larger will kill it too fast anyway

They literally just swapped the stuart and the aaht and it made the tech SO much better. 2 forms of suppression in the same tier makes no sense


Yea but even the AEC isn't really the intermediate AT THE OP is looking for. It's not particularly viable to be your main medium AT. Support sure, but not something like the puma or su76 or even stug. That's what I'm getting at.


I'd say it's pretty on-par with puma or su76. Same damage, and a really solid snare ability. It's definitely better at AT than the Stuart
8 Nov 2019, 11:52 AM
#66
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

Yea but even the AEC isn't really the intermediate AT THE OP is looking for. It's not particularly viable to be your main medium AT. Support sure, but not something like the puma or su76 or even stug. That's what I'm getting at.


The AEC and the Puma are pretty close to being the same unit.
8 Nov 2019, 12:02 PM
#67
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Nov 2019, 11:52 AMLago


The AEC and the Puma are pretty close to being the same unit.

There is slight difference - Puma can reliably fight meds despite low pen, while AEC can help against them, but certainly can't fight them off by itself despite better long range pen.

They are same archetype, but their performance and potential differs massively.
AEC is better support for and against infantry, while Puma is actually a light tank destroyer.
8 Nov 2019, 12:08 PM
#68
avatar of Freestyler1992

Posts: 88

Hm that would mean m10 supported by jackson every single game. No thanks.
8 Nov 2019, 12:13 PM
#69
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

There is slight difference - Puma can reliably fight meds despite low pen, while AEC can help against them, but certainly can't fight them off by itself despite better long range pen.

They are same archetype, but their performance and potential differs massively.
AEC is better support for and against infantry, while Puma is actually a light tank destroyer


The Puma can't really reliably defeat medium tanks by itself without a lot of veterancy. But they've both got the firepower to penetrate a medium and, in pairs or with ATG support, can win that fight. They're enough of a threat that a medium has to respect them.

The Stuart, despite ostensibly being an AT unit, is pretty much helpless. The best it can do is blow a load of munitions on Shell Shock and run away.

If the AEC and the Stuart were in the same tier, I don't think you'd ever see Stuarts.
9 Nov 2019, 01:22 AM
#70
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Nov 2019, 12:13 PMLago


The Puma can't really reliably defeat medium tanks by itself without a lot of veterancy. But they've both got the firepower to penetrate a medium and, in pairs or with ATG support, can win that fight. They're enough of a threat that a medium has to respect them.

The Stuart, despite ostensibly being an AT unit, is pretty much helpless. The best it can do is blow a load of munitions on Shell Shock and run away.

If the AEC and the Stuart were in the same tier, I don't think you'd ever see Stuarts.

Puma is a league above the AEC imo.
The fact that the puma doesn't need to be in return fire range is just so huge given both of their low durability.
Then the aimed shot for the puma just makes it such a superior support unit (it can even force team weapons to redeploy so it can support infantry or friendly armour)

Making the Stuart like an AEC might work, but I'm under no impression it would fill anything like the role it would if you instead mirrored the puma (not suggesting that by any means tho)
9 Nov 2019, 06:54 AM
#71
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351

I like Stuart. It can reliably chase infantry. My favourite use is to drain munitions and models from your opponent thanks to its crew. You kill a model or two on the edge of the map and make the unit retreat. You absorb a faust before they retreat and quickly repair. I like Stuart stun shots when it is helping against mediums. When I have a Sherman I can kill pretty much all mediums when Stuart is around. Just like aec and Cromwell.
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

877 users are online: 2 members and 875 guests
188bet88design, LCarlos
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49145
Welcome our newest member, 188bet88design
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM