Sniper bugged
by
taxman66
1st August 2019, 07:42 AM
- [00:24:38] Taxman66:
- [00:25:22] Taxman66:
- [00:25:31] Shadow War:
- [00:25:42] Taxman66:
- [00:25:45] Taxman66:
- [00:25:47] Shadow War:
- [00:25:54] Taxman66:
- [00:26:11] Taxman66:
- [00:26:14] Taxman66:
- [00:26:20] Shadow War:
- [00:26:24] Taxman66:
- [00:26:25] Taxman66:
- [00:26:30] Taxman66:
- [00:26:41] Shadow War:
1 Aug 2019, 07:42 AM
#1
Posts: 276
Permanently BannedSniper vet ability doesnt work on soviets. Great cost
 | Playercard of Taxman66 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Unable to resolve id taxman66"] stats="[923651:51,923651:7,923651:6,923651:5,923651:4
1 Aug 2019, 08:01 AM
#2
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Sniper vet ability doesnt work on soviets. Great cost
??
For me the flars works
1 Aug 2019, 08:11 AM
#3
Posts: 276
Permanently BannedNo, not the flares. The stun bullet, it didnt do anything.
| Playercard of Taxman66 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Unable to resolve id taxman66"] stats="[923651:51,923651:7,923651:6,923651:5,923651:4
1 Aug 2019, 08:28 AM
#4
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
No, not the flares. The stun bullet, it didnt do anything.
Timestamp would help.
1 Aug 2019, 11:45 AM
#5
Posts: 3029 | Subs: 3
No, not the flares. The stun bullet, it didnt do anything.
What do you mean with "it didnt do anything"? The shot didnt fire? The shot missed? The squad did not get stunned?
Because the latter would not be a bug
1 Aug 2019, 12:46 PM
#6
Posts: 276
Permanently Banned
What do you mean with "it didnt do anything"? The shot didnt fire? The shot missed? The squad did not get stunned?
Because the latter would not be a bug
Only the targetted model died. The squad retreated with only 1 man down. So it was useless.
| Playercard of Taxman66 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Unable to resolve id taxman66"] stats="[923651:51,923651:7,923651:6,923651:5,923651:4
1 Aug 2019, 14:19 PM
#7
Posts: 3029 | Subs: 3
Not a bug then.
1 Aug 2019, 15:06 PM
#8
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Only the targetted model died. The squad retreated with only 1 man down. So it was useless.
Don't use it for the miniscule chance it burns a nearby model, it's far too expensive for that. Use the incendiary round on the following occassions:
- To shoot a retreating model that absolutely has to be killed. It will have a much higher hit chance.
- To quickly fire 2 rounds after each other. It can be fired almost instantly after a normal round.
- To fire outside the normal range of your Sniper. At vet 3 it gets 60 range versus the usual 50 range.
- To finish off a light vehicle. It will be guaranteed to penetrate and does 50 damage.
- To save your Sniper with the stun if it has to retreat through an enemy squad.
- To save one of your low health squads or vehicles that's fleeing from enemy infantry.
It's a very strong multipurpose tool and definitely not useless.
1 Aug 2019, 15:19 PM
#9
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Don't use it for the miniscule chance it burns a nearby model, it's far too expensive for that. Use the incendiary round on the following occassions:
- To shoot a retreating model that absolutely has to be killed. It will have a much higher hit chance.
- To quickly fire 2 rounds after each other. It can be fired almost instantly after a normal round.
- To fire outside the normal range of your Sniper. At vet 3 it gets 60 range versus the usual 50 range.
- To finish off a light vehicle. It will be guaranteed to penetrate and does 50 damage.
- To save your Sniper with the stun if it has to retreat through an enemy squad.
- To save one of your low health squads or vehicles that's fleeing from enemy infantry.
It's a very strong multipurpose tool and definitely not useless.
Some good points, but one is wrong.
We removed the double shoot funtion. Like we did on pershing too. It was too powerful. So it takes some times to get the shot out.
1 Aug 2019, 15:29 PM
#10
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Some good points, but one is wrong.
We removed the double shoot funtion. Like we did on pershing too. It was too powerful. So it takes some times to get the shot out.
Not true, I've tested it at all vet levels and the incendiary round comes much much faster than waiting for normal reload.
Here's a video as proof, the difference becomes even more apparent at lower vet levels: https://youtu.be/YghERw95zn4
Pershing vet ability does share the same reload.
1 Aug 2019, 17:34 PM
#11
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Not true, I've tested it at all vet levels and the incendiary round comes much much faster than waiting for normal reload.
Here's a video as proof, the difference becomes even more apparent at lower vet levels: https://youtu.be/YghERw95zn4
Pershing vet ability does share the same reload.
well i mean, that in past you could make 2 shoots like in 1 sec
i know OP
1 Aug 2019, 18:10 PM
#12
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
well i mean, that in past you could make 2 shoots like in 1 sec
"Almost instantly after a normal round" was perhaps not the right wording, but my point still stands. The ability pretty much guarantees a wipe for any 2-man squad that gets shot within 30 range of the Ostheer Sniper, even if the squad retreats right after.
1 Aug 2019, 19:00 PM
#13
Posts: 276
Permanently BannedIt didnt burn nor did it stun.
| Playercard of Taxman66 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Unable to resolve id taxman66"] stats="[923651:51,923651:7,923651:6,923651:5,923651:4
1 Aug 2019, 19:11 PM
#14
Posts: 3029 | Subs: 3
It didnt burn nor did it stun.
and the other models were in a radius of 3?
1 Aug 2019, 19:47 PM
#15
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
It didnt burn nor did it stun.
95% to stun =/= 100%
1 Aug 2019, 21:12 PM
#16
Posts: 3029 | Subs: 3
95% to stun =/= 100%
wait, does that mean there is a chance that nothing happens even if the squad is clumped? Or that both crits (burning + stun) appear simultaneously at once? Cuz how I understood this ability description is that it's either stun (95%) OR burning (5%) but never both and always one of both.
1 Aug 2019, 21:37 PM
#17
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
wait, does that mean there is a chance that nothing happens even if the squad is clumped? Or that both crits (burning + stun) appear simultaneously at once? Cuz how I understood this ability description is that it's either stun (95%) OR burning (5%) but never both and always one of both.
You're right, read it wrong.
1 Aug 2019, 22:40 PM
#18
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Some good points, but one is wrong.
We removed the double shoot funtion. Like we did on pershing too. It was too powerful. So it takes some times to get the shot out.
There's still a way to double shot, although not as well as the old iteration. It is still very quick and rarely misses.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
101 | ||
 |
|
|
46 | ||
 |
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
629 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.483190.718-1
- 4.587233.716+3
- 5.1095612.641+19
- 6.890398.691+12
- 7.280162.633+8
- 8.1004649.607+5
- 9.304113.729+4
- 10.379114.769+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1006
Board Info
875 users are online:
1 member and 874 guests
SneakEye
SneakEye
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
25 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
25 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48764
Welcome our newest member, 188betctcom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, 188betctcom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM