Login

russian armor

vs Urban Assault Doctrine

by Australian Magic 9th April 2016, 22:29 PM
Minsk Pocket (4)
Minsk Pocket
  • [00:00:15] TAB Australian Magic: what the hell? :O Urban? :O
  • [00:00:25] Treaser: ;)
  • [00:00:35] TAB Australian Magic: I want one!
  • [00:00:45] Treaser: haha
  • [00:05:44] TAB Australian Magic: come on :O
  • [00:09:14] Treaser: ouch:p
  • [00:09:23] TAB Australian Magic: karma
  • [00:25:33] Treaser: n1
  • [00:25:42] TAB Australian Magic: ty
  • [00:48:04] TAB Australian Magic: gg
  • [00:48:08] Treaser: gg
Honor
Honor it
0
Chat
Show Chat
Patch: 3.0.0.21132
Duration: 00:48:08
9 Apr 2016, 22:29 PM
#1
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Damn, how did he get that commander? :o

Really good game.
No maxim cancer.
Urban PzGrens.
Panthers vs T34/85.
10 Apr 2016, 17:29 PM
#2
avatar of Napalm

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

That's crazy.
11 Apr 2016, 09:29 AM
#3
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

What's more impressive is that he used Urban Assault Doctrine on Minsk Pocket. A map that is pretty much as far from Urban as one can get.
11 Apr 2016, 09:33 AM
#4
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

What's more impressive is that he used Urban Assault Doctrine on Minsk Pocket. A map that is pretty much as far from Urban as one can get.


I strongly belive, he uses this doctrine all the time, no matter if minsk or la glieze.

Still, Urban PzGrens can annihilate maxims and other crew weapon in seconds. Maybe that was his idea?
11 Apr 2016, 12:09 PM
#5
avatar of Tatatala

Posts: 589

Wait a minute... Urban Assault doctrine, that was never released? We talking about the same thing? This was auto-match?
11 Apr 2016, 12:49 PM
#6
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Wait a minute... Urban Assault doctrine, that was never released? We talking about the same thing? This was auto-match?


Yup. The same one which should be burried along side with not one step back.
11 Apr 2016, 17:47 PM
#7
avatar of Napalm

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

I'll put the theory out there that this is a developers personal account.
11 Apr 2016, 19:19 PM
#8
avatar of siddolio

Posts: 471 | Subs: 1

The guy got it from winning a video contest that relic hosted, Relic said he can have any commander and they gave him that
11 Apr 2016, 21:00 PM
#9
avatar of VIPUKS

Posts: 431 | Subs: 1

The guy got it from winning a video contest that relic hosted, Relic said he can have any commander and they gave him that

He should have asked for not one step back commander. All these con armys...
11 Apr 2016, 22:14 PM
#10
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Dudes with stuff and command KT would be even better choice :hansGASM:
12 Apr 2016, 01:18 AM
#11
avatar of Hikuran

Posts: 194

Dudes with stuff and command KT would be even better choice :hansGASM:


Dat "dudes with stuffs" unit description made me laugh for at least 10 mins when it got released with OKW:D

But that commander is not much of use in real fight, too up
17 Apr 2016, 05:32 AM
#12
avatar of MrSotkoGaming
Donator 11

Posts: 452 | Subs: 1

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 2
Canada 1
unknown 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

830 users are online: 2 members and 828 guests
violatemilky, Brick Top
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49399
Welcome our newest member, violatemilky
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM