UKF is disgustingly OP
- [00:00:11] Stormjäger:
- [00:00:18] miragefla:
- [00:00:23] Stormjäger:
- [00:00:23] miragefla:
- [00:00:24] Stormjäger:
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 9
It's interesting to see a game closed off so quickly. Well played!
I'm pretty new to casting so happy to get any constructive feedback
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 224
Posts: 1701
There are a few tricks you can pull as OKW to shut down a Brit player early in a 1v1 *cough*Elite Armour*cough*
*cough*221 has nothing on a Bren Carrier*coughcough*
Posts: 56
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
There are a few tricks you can pull as OKW to shut down a Brit player early in a 1v1 *cough*Elite Armour*cough*
The moment I see that as UKF I build a UC with a Vickers and you've wasted 200mp 15fuel and a doctrine pick and you've lost.
Not going Overwatch abuse vs UKF = autolose
i don't see anything wrong in that game... just l2p issues
Tried and tested ww1 tactics.
Posts: 224
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
How does a Bren Carrier beat a 221 though? You always have the advantage of forcing the engagement - you have a turret, they don't. Be creative. It's hardly a waste of a doctrine pick either - the Sturmtiger is great, you get artillery and accuracy from Panzer Commander and HEAT rounds are the cherry on top.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am_gUl3wFVQ
Any non-overwatch doctrine vs UKF is a waste, only way you can win vs UKF is JLI and booby trap abuse.
Posts: 224
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
So you made a really bad call charging with no support into two Sections and an upgunned Bren carrier and suddenly the strategy doesn't work?
Yes you spot the UC 1v1 with the 221 and then it retreats back to its support because I'm not retarded, the 221 gets damaged and has to be repaired. This is repeated 2 more times before the AEC comes out at 4.5 mins and cucks you.
We done here?
Posts: 224
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
You should be capping or charging with your infantry
He tried, and he got baselocked from the left within 2 engagements.
and also rushing a Puma if you're worried about an AEC.
He had no fuel income + AEC would have hit at 4.5mins + 221 is 15 fuel so it's a 7min Puma with this fuel control that would have done nothing.
Posts: 11
Posts: 1701
He tried, and he got baselocked from the left within 2 engagements.
He had no fuel income + AEC would have hit at 4.5mins + 221 is 15 fuel so it's a 7min Puma with this fuel control that would have done nothing.
Your point is already proven enough man, stop beating a dead horse lol
Posts: 224
He tried, and he got baselocked from the left within 2 engagements.
He had no fuel income + AEC would have hit at 4.5mins + 221 is 15 fuel so it's a 7min Puma with this fuel control that would have done nothing.
All I'm seeing here is he got outplayed, nothing faction-specific other than he doesn't know how to deal with Sections. I have no trouble eating Brits for breakfast early game as OKW.
Posts: 1701
All I'm seeing here is he got outplayed, nothing faction-specific other than he doesn't know how to deal with Sections. I have no trouble eating Brits for breakfast early game as OKW.
Well in rank 500+ you may have no problem, but as soon as you get higher rank, you will have a completely different experience
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
try to have a rematch vs miragefla see if its the same resolt brits are op!
Posts: 17
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
at leats they were no trench warfare tactics ^^
I teched Bofors by accident so my plan was to set up a Bofors right between his 2 cutoffs and baselock him with Bofors + mortar pit + valentine + sniper + trenches. :3
Livestreams
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.588215.732+3
- 4.1098613.642+2
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
6 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, greveling99nl
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM