Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: 5man grens OP?8 Jun 2020, 12:57 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 12:54 PMblvckdream VSL Grens are not OP and probably the reason why Axis won so few games because the late-game is almost non-existent compared to Jäger Armour for example. At least that's my theory. I don't really know why this doctrine is so popular now and it seems more like a case of "group-think" sheep mentality that everyone is using it now. I agree that it's meta for a reason in 1v1 but in 2v2?? Yeah, all the top player sheeps who can't think for themselves and just copy glorious 4 digit players meta In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5man grens OP?8 Jun 2020, 12:42 PM They were used in 100% games where axis won. The game when they were not used was lost badly. I can see no other conclusion, but to dub them an overpowered game changer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment8 Jun 2020, 12:32 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 12:25 PMachpawel Smoke barrage? Make it WP and you've got actually a decent idea. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment8 Jun 2020, 12:15 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 12:11 PMVipper The camo for vehicles is simply badly designed since the rotation penalty make it unusable for SU-85 and SU-76. Although the bonus are crazy. One should probably remove both penalties and bonuses or tailor them according to vehicle. But it makes it usable for JP4 huh? Superior german engineering at it again bois, camo on casemates doesn't work and is impractical, but only on allied casemates. Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 11:54 AMSelvy289 After playing around with the su76 for awhile, the unit isnt too bad but just needs a small bump (with what has already been suggested). One thing that I don't think fits the unit is the tracking ability. Even through the ability is good, I would prefer something to reinforce its use of its range. Ideally camo would be decent applying a buff like the camo at you find in the commanders. Annoyingly this already exist in the anti-tank commander that no one had ever used. While I do agree that vet1 should be changed and more tailored for the unit itself, camo certainly should not be it, if only for the reason its already doctrinal ability. Commander however is unused for many different reasons, it provides AT improvements for a faction that no longer has AT problems. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Making OKW Battlegroup viable8 Jun 2020, 12:14 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 12:08 PMblvckdream Another constructive thread derailed by Vipper and Katitof. RIP. What doesn't make any sense about this thread is that OKW went mechanized and Axis still got absolutely deleted in UTT2. OKW is just too weak in general and it's not because of teching but because Infantry Sections, Riflemen and Conscripts all got buffed recently while OKW got less MP to start. Oh yeah, all these riflemen wrecking axis in the tournament. Also, it doesn't matter how weak or strong your infantry is, you WILL be wiped by rocket arty and extremely conservative play and lack of pushing when you are holding the advantage. Have you even watched the games or just hear that allies won finals and are ranting off of that? Most of the games were extremely close, proving balance is good and better players won. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Making OKW Battlegroup viable8 Jun 2020, 12:03 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 11:58 AMVipper The creation of a need to OKW tech changes was pointed out when the USF tech revamp went forward. Then you will have to nerf these units as one has to do with USF units because these factions where designed to be played with a limited roster and units that are OP because of it. The trend of making powerful unit available earlier is messing with pace of the game and this start to show. Many unit unit are cost efficient but do not get used simply because their window of opportunity is to small. So what's the problem? OKW will need to be nerfed at the end, its precisely what you suggest in every balance thread - nerfs. You'll finally get what you constantly advocate for and you're still unhappy? Imo you should start delaying many unit and increase the window of opportunity for unit give return for their investment. In the case of OKW one could try lowering the cost for setting up T2 so that one can have access to faust at the same time but delay vehicles by locking them behind tech like repair engineers. That would also require similar adjustments to allied vehicles also. That lowers window of opportunity for M3 and WC51. You can't "increase window of opportunity" by decreasing it for other units. For someone who tried to berate ME on importance of timing, you seem to be completely oblivious to what changes like that would inflict on balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FINALLY remove the MORTAR PIT!8 Jun 2020, 11:31 AM Lost a game to brits or watched too much 2v2 twich? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Making OKW Battlegroup viable8 Jun 2020, 10:30 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 10:24 AMSmartie Yeah, you have a good point. Maybe it could work like the tech for the AEC: You need to unlock the Luchs first. That should help with the timing issue. Higher building time could also be an option. It already got high build time because it was arriving too fast in mechanized. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Making OKW Battlegroup viable8 Jun 2020, 10:02 AM Out of all the switcheroos, this one is quite reasonable, however the cost of the tech would need to get even higher, because we REALLY do NOT need a 5 min luchs and I somehow do not see 90 fuel luchs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF M20 dead?8 Jun 2020, 09:43 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 09:41 AMVipper Thank you. Glad that you are starting to appreciate the power of making a units available earlier. You're welcome. However I have to point out that you've spelled "removing from the game" wrong. In: COH2 Balance