Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Does the Zis really need barrage?6 Jun 2014, 05:47 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jun 2014, 05:31 AM__deleted__ Not having a problem with it. Just stating that it's strange from game point of view o have a gun that serves well 2 purposes: AI and AT. And why would that be? Debates if ZiS-3 is AT gun or artillery gun go up to this day without an agreement as it served equally as both. Its also strange from game pov that FHT can reinforce, its strange that parked trucks magically generate income and so on and so forth. Many of sov units offspec somewhere, because its needed from the gameplay pov, because they will never have as varied unit selection as ost does. And dodging the barrage is not a problem for any mobile unit. For an mg though, it is: if first projectile kills the gunner, even if you hit the retreat buton, your squad has a good chance to die, because of the animation - next soldier will take gunner's place, then they will think a little bit, then they will pack the gun, then they will retreat. In all this time, ZIS will fire (due to the good ROF)at list 3 barrage shots. Only "if" it kills the gunner. And that is a big if. Otherwise its just as easily as with any other squad, I've had numerous barrages where it did absolutely jack to MG that simply repositioned 3 steps to the side. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson Unit Reveal6 Jun 2014, 05:30 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2014, 22:47 PMFichtenMoped This thing can'stand a chance against an Elephant I guess :3 Well, US does have handheld AT for the infantry and its not like Jackson is SU-85 and can't flank for real. In: Lobby
Thread: M36 Jackson Unit Reveal5 Jun 2014, 21:49 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2014, 21:26 PMcrash wow great post, you should take it We both know this will happen. And when it will, I'll just post "called it first". In: Lobby
Thread: M36 Jackson Unit Reveal5 Jun 2014, 20:42 PM SU-85 with turret, let the "OMG PANTHOR DILITID RERIC HATEZ US POOR GURMUNZ" begin! In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger infos5 Jun 2014, 20:40 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2014, 20:36 PMMr. Someguy What if you enter a 4v4 where 3 Ostheer players set up Fuel Caches and Opels on every sector, and you park your Trucks on the main Fuel, can you get 2 then? What if I told you that OKW army essence is being resource starved and no amount of caches will change that? In: Lobby
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies5 Jun 2014, 20:33 PM I can already see the tears for the jackson In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger infos5 Jun 2014, 20:30 PM And how do you know its possible to get more then one? Or what makes you believe you will be able to afford it? In: Lobby
Thread: Teching and call ins. 5 Jun 2014, 20:27 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2014, 19:39 PMCptEend In beta teching was in fact a requirement for call-ins and it was changed. Certainly for Soviets it was annoying, because it actually discouraged diversity. Reason being that it forced you to get T3 if you wanted 85s, whereas now you can get T4 for SUs, and get 85s from call-ins (for instance). I think increasing the CP requirements is a much better idea. That way you'll be punished waiting for those call-ins simply because you're floating resources that you could've used on units from base buildings. In beta call-ins were completely replacing base unit. That didn't proved to work at all. And people will still wait for call-ins. Why? Because they still are simply upgrades of default units in most cases. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we have a stat reset with Western fronts?5 Jun 2014, 19:30 PM New armies will start from default elo level, regardless of who will play them and be matched accordingly, so why the fuss? And if we had no ladder reset after a horrible balance disaster that was march deployment, then there is no reason to ever get it, unless CoH2 will get seasons. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Forward HQ is completely broken. 5 Jun 2014, 17:54 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2014, 17:40 PMFlyingsmonster Oh look, it's this guy again who manages to shitpost in every thread he enters, ignores any contradictory evidence to his own bias, and has over 20x as many posts here as game's he has played (not even counting the official forums, where you manage to post even more). Do you simply spend all day on both forums? Why do you want to discuss a game so much that you have hardly played? Perhaps you should either look at the replay I posted in the original post, or the one I posted on the last page showing the use of FHQ on Semois in a 2v2 match, and how even though one soviet player was simply spamming mortars, there was essentially no counter or ability to destroy the building in any capacity. I did. All it proved was that german players had no slightest idea where the incendiary shell button is and use it twice, one after another. One incendiary barrage will be not enough and a waste of muni, dropping one after another will burn FHQ to the ground 100% of the time. I find 90 muni to be rather cost effective counter to 300mp 60fu. If you want to prove something, make sure you play against opponents who actually do have a clue on the game, they had right tools to hardcounter FHQ, they have failed miserably with understanding on how it works and how to use it. In: COH2 Balance