Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback8 Jan 2021, 10:32 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 10:31 AMmrgame2 i can think of a compensation to german infantry, change the HT to Tiger! I've got better one. Change all 5 abilities into tiger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback8 Jan 2021, 10:22 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 10:18 AMmrgame2 thats correct. the doctrine is called 'german infantry' if the vsl infantry cant even beat stock enemy units, what is the compensation? after patch, why not rename to 'german infantry with some stamps and fireworks' Live vsl barely hold out against allies elites, you need that first strike to do well. Let me present you a soviet partisan doctrine. Should we buff partisans to beat stock axis infantry based on your logic here? Much cheaper unit with half the muni cost in upgrades is still much cheaper unit with half the muni cost in upgrades. Upgrade provides additional durability at the cost of firepower, its not Hitlerium Ubermensch injection despite this being the case on life, because drumroll ITS OVERPOWERED ATM. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback8 Jan 2021, 10:15 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 10:00 AMmrgame2 anyone tested live vsl with patched vsl against allies infantry? the strength of vsl is to first strike to drop allies dps. imo any loss in performance against stock allies infantry is very unfair. any loss in performance against allies call-in infantry is unfair. i think vsl is 2 or 3 cp with longer deploy times than allies. That's a terrible way to argue keeping unit with OP characteristics that steps over another upgrades shoes. what compensation does vsl gets to select its doctrine? You don't compensate nerfing OP things. That is why its called a nerf. Its too strong and needs to be put in line. Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 10:08 AMZeroZeroNi m8 that's a 20% ish decrease in both close max range. That is not small though. Did you do a test to see weather their combat performance remains similar. Now that you looked at extreme values, wipe your tears and take another look at values between range 15 and 30. Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 10:10 AMmrgame2 i cry hard in frustation. Not being one sided wehraboo and understanding why changes are being made will prevent that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stupid Ideas for the game7 Jan 2021, 22:19 PM Economies reflecting actual factions economy of the faction during the time, territory captures are only for victory points. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 15:17 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 15:16 PMPip Are they or are they not assault infantry? They are also "Engineers", but they are primarily assault infantry. I don't know. They seem to have a lot more "engineer" abilities then "assault" ones on their grid. Again, if we called "Assault Grenadiers" "Assault Pioneers" would that solve the issue of them being able to build Bunkers? We already have assault pioneers in game. Its OKW starting unit. It would be inconsistent to have 2 completely different units with the same name. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 15:07 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 15:05 PMPip Look, katitof, just admit you're not actually arguing from a logical basis here and be done with it. This is very childish. No, I'm super cereal here. Assault Engineers are an assault squad that can also build fighting positions. This contradicts your earlier assertion that assault squads "cannot build bunkers". They are engineers, just like spios. See Vipper's post for why this "consistency" argument holds no water. Vippers posts lack consistency and arguments. You have the same hardon for unnecessarily, and pointlessly nerfing axis units as you accuse others of doing for allied ones. Please stop projecting. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 15:04 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 15:01 PMVipper I guess one could removed bunker from assault grenadiers and sandbag, trenches and cashes from assault infatry section, sandbags from MP40 grenadiers and sandbag from PPsh conscripts. Post game efficiency dictates that these are essential tools for them to work. Also, there are no MP40 grenadiers in CoH2. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 15:01 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 15:00 PMPip Just change the name of Assgrens to Assault Pioneers then, then there's no problem. We can't, it would be inconsistent with sturmpioneers, sturm means assault in german. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 14:55 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 14:52 PMPip I suppose we need to remove Fighting Positions from Assault Engineers, too, then? Even if we were to take your "Consistency" argument at face value... it isnt even the case that "all other assault infantry can't build bunkers", as AssEngies do. We can't. They are engineers. Its in the name. Engineers are supposed to build these things. Its consistent. They are assault infantry, too, don't try and pretend they aren't. Read their name very carefully and slowly, as many times as you need, no rush. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 14:48 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 14:46 PMPip Other assault infantry's mainline counterparts can't either. This isnt a change that needs implementing. Then we need to remove it from grens for consistency too. In: COH2 Balance