Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Sturm pioneers are overpriced20 Mar 2015, 12:17 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Mar 2015, 12:07 PMJaigen Do yourself a favour and get lost. In general the allies are better at short range engagements then the axis who favour long range battles. because of that the assault engineers are more viable then sp's. And he is right you know. counter his arguments or piss of. There is no need to counter his 'argument' because his argument is an utter bullshit which comes from him(or you as you back him up on it) not having the slightest clue what DPS curves are and how to actually read them. Shocks(or SMG units in general) do NO damage outside of their effective range. Assault rifle units(which SPs are) still do damage outside of their close range, it drops faster then that of a rifles, but it is INCOMPARABLY HIGHER then that of SMG units on pretty much ALL ranges above 10. Arguing that assault engies are better then sturmpios because their dmg dropoff starts bit later is completely out of place argument that goes against the stats and common sense, because by the time AEs get in effective range, SPs can already drop a model or deal heavy damage, but we're already used to that coming from you or sierra. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Veterancy for MG Nests20 Mar 2015, 12:07 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Mar 2015, 12:00 PMATCF VET 5 sandbags, i bet they reflect bullets against the enemy too? They become dow2 eldar shields In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sturm pioneers are overpriced20 Mar 2015, 09:56 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Mar 2015, 08:28 AMJohnnyB Related to Luchs I think different. Don't get me wrong, I believe Luchs is a verry potent light tank and perform its role just as good as T70 is doing it, but in a direct confrontation who will win most of the times? So since their performances as light tanks are quite similar, the only thing that make the difference is how they are performing one against the other. T70 being superior at this chapter, wins. You do not get lights to fight each other, Stuart is the only light tank somewhat designed to fight armor, two others are almost exclusively AI with added benefit of being able to dmg light armor. You get them to fight infantry and light armor, this is what Luchs does incomparably better. Also, luchs HP alone makes it best light tank by default by MILES. Comparing light tanks in a direct combat makes as much sense as comparing mortars in direct combat-they do fight sometimes, but just because soviet one can precision strike german one it does not make it better then german one even in the slightest. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU 76 isn't that bad20 Mar 2015, 09:31 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2015, 17:59 PMNinjaWJ i wish the unit was cheaper I wish it was useful. But can't see how is that related to strategies as none exists that would include it. I once met a player who used a pair to good extend, but that was a single game over 2 years, that says something. In: Red Army Strategies
Thread: Possible leak on March 31st patch notes19 Mar 2015, 23:20 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2015, 22:46 PMAlexzandvar Who do I annoy? If they have a problem they can say so instead of sicking the mods on me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74BzSTQCl_c&feature=youtu.be&t=10s In: Lobby
Thread: OST Panzerwerfer: Truly Underpowered19 Mar 2015, 23:13 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2015, 22:58 PMAlexzandvar It dies in literally one shot, even shooting it at medium distance is ineffective due to the fact it's scatter was never fixed after the amount of rockets it fired was reduced and they changed how artillery works. You need to be extremely close in order to hit anything with a reasonable amount of accuracy, and when it dies in literally 1 shot to any explosive weapon and dies easy to small arms fire that's a tough proposition. It's also very very expensive due to teching. It costs almost as much to get a Panzerwerfer than to get a Tiger. It also inferior to the Katyusha in every way despite costing just as much. Pssst, I have a secret for you And don't compare it to katyusha, they are both rocket arty, that is one and only common thing they have, one is slow and its barrage is area saturation/denial, other one is mobile and is meant to deliver alpha strike and back off. T-70 and SU-76 also have same cost, are in different tiers and are guns equipped on T-70 chassis. Similar doesn't equal to same and contrary to what you firmly believe, axis are not supposed to have everything superior. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OST Panzerwerfer: Truly Underpowered19 Mar 2015, 22:52 PM Don't shoot it from max distance into fog of war, drive closer, unload, back off, its highly mobile and quick to fire for that specific reason. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Possible leak on March 31st patch notes19 Mar 2015, 20:08 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2015, 19:57 PMKhan The OKW fanboy butt-hurt on this thread is real. It will be when it gets to THE axis trio Stacking on popcorn already. In: Lobby
Thread: Possible leak on March 31st patch notes19 Mar 2015, 19:53 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2015, 19:41 PMGluhoman I don't think nerfing is2 is a good idea, is2 accuracy is shit, tiger is better in that way. It might that is2 after this patch will be shit. I'm all for nerfing everything that prevents medium tanks from being used. If tiger will prove to be too strong in comparison, lets not buff IS-2, but nerfbat the tiger. Its a high time for heavies to have exploitable disadvantages that would make it a decision, not breaindead upgrade for your armor. Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2015, 19:47 PMEsxile Since 99% of Axis players are playing Ostheer or OKW because those factions and their units are so cool, it's not gonna happen. In: Lobby
Thread: RELIC-how about you tell us what is in the march 31 patch!19 Mar 2015, 19:08 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2015, 18:31 PMvan Voort That question is purely rhetorical right? Duuh In: Lobby