The Kubel should at least get shared veterancy and it needs a rotation boost since the vehicle is notorious for getting stuck and being unable to make those harder turns. I believe it's at 32 which is not that great.
After that, maybe give it some sort of ability to make it an ideal unit to rebuild such as camouflauge so it can act as a forward spotter, siphoning or something utility-based that's not just its veterancy 1 map hack. |
I don't see why British Tommies, an already very durable, hard to kill squad, with bonuses in cover (and no penalties out of cover). This seems incredibly powerful, why not give them 2-3 thompsons and leave their rifles? That way they aren't brutally devastating at close range?
There's a reason they didn't give the Panzergrenadiers a 5th man with an SMG in the Infantry Doctrine, they just made them run faster! Hah, can you imagine 5 panzergrens ontop of you? Well.. tommies are probably right up there if you give them 5 SMG's in the unit that most Brits build 4 of.
It's a specialization and role change upgrade that has the opportunity cost of locking out medical kits and flares with a higher munition cost than either. It's a choice and one of the ways for the commander to use ammunition. If their durability or the timing is an issue it can be changed, but they are geared towards dedicated AI work unlike a unit such as Cavalry Riflemen who have AT Satchels to fend off vehicles or PGs who can transition to AT. |
I would say either bundle their grenades or make them dirt cheap and I keep saying I believe they should be cheaper as the game progresses in reinforce cost or maybe cover bonuses in the late game through the T4.
You could probably tone down some vet, but if this infantry is supposed to be utility, defensive meatshields when not upgraded they shouldn't bleed as hard in the late game and be better if you do lose vetted squads. |
A fix for the medics has been prepared. It just needs to be deployed. SVTs will also be fixed.
This is the issue with the SCAR for letting us have the shiny menus. Lots of things require manual overrides unlike standard attribute packs that update and override cloned files automatically. |
I disagree with A-E's ideas. It's way too drastic and suffers from things that would gut the unit.
Not only is the squad not a proper AT squad from the get-go, unlike upgraded Panzergrenadiers -double schrecks are something that is very scary for tanks- as 144 damage is not only odd, but it's in this weird middle ground for 120/160 while have much less alphas strike damage than x2 Schrecks.
The strange mix of weapons is a very much "Why" thing and does nothing for the squad as the StG has to not be a slot item to ensure you don't lose your schreck, but the squad doesn't know what it wants to do. Slower movement speed is also a "Why" thing as no other infantry gets it and infantry can't keep up with most vehicles to begin with. The only thing really going for them is the Reigal, which should be available on all Ostheer lights, and smoke suits standard PGs better than an AT squad.
If anything the Panzerschreck upgrade could give them more AT stuff at the cost of other things, but the current package already works for what it offers.
Also I disagree with Ostheer not being allowed to have assault or mid-range infantry as a non-doctrinal thing. Their role can work in the army, they just need some adjustments, not a massive overhaul.
|
What if you made T2 buildable from the start and locked the 222 and 251 behind Battle Phase 1?
You'd be able to deploy PGrens straight away, but paying the manpower cost of T2 up front and the higher cost of PGrens means you'll have roughly two fewer squads on the field than the T2 build would if you try to mainline them.
What do you think?
I believe that would be too soon. Their deployment at earliest could be around anywhere from 3-5 minutes into the game that doesn't include skipping T1 builds. They already have a number of counters also available before they arrive and at least they have to fight at mid-short range to be effective.
And Katitof, none of those early units can deal with the UC or MGs outside flanks and your idea requires a back-tech to T1 so there is cost and time involved there. If Sturms and Volks cannot take on a UC in the first 2-3 minutes of the game, I doubt stock PGs would either as you need snares to be effective versus a well-microed one until AT or 222s hit the field. I don't see fanboyism in the post.
From what I gather, though, utility and abilities, such as the Infantry Doctrine's PG Training, seem to be the way the go such as their passive when near armor which gives them bonuses or more things to do that isn't just 'More DPS' which is their main purpose at the moment and all they do.
|
I would be for making its shell like the Sturmtiger where it deals suppressions/added effects to targets in the area and maybe splitting the damage and adjusting the AOE so its 2 shell per shot. Makes it less of a bunker buster/line breaker compared to the ML-20, but it's much better at stopping troop movements/disabling active units.
It's too inconsistent in most cases and ML-20s are much better at shelling defenses. |
I think a lot of the reason players don't get them is due to the G43 access on grenadiers. G43s allow for highly mobile grenadiers but also bolster their CQC DPS substantially. They won't be beating rangers, but they can very much hold their own against closing squads. I think this causes no real reason to select pgrens over just getting another cheaper grenadier and tossing 45 munis into the upgrade. I think the G43 upgrade needs to be looked at as well, as I beleive it does too much for too little cost.
I don't think its G43s for Grenadiers who arguably do the short-mid range much worse with LMGs being a much better investment on most maps for the long term. As I have stated, LMGs are much easier to use in most cases and others have mentioned the high concentration of DPS and not needing to close makes Grenadiers a good option in most cases, even if it costs munitions over manpower.
On five man, I feel that while it does offer the rare 5 men to Ostheer, the change in DPS might be too much? And I'm always iffy on the single schreck because unlike Sturmpioneers, Panzergrenadiers get their important combat vet sooner and their StGs are better.
I do enjoy seeing what other people have to say on the unit. |
This is only my views and opinions and does not relate to the Commander Balance Preview or any things that might come from Relic. I just wanted to put out this topic to get views on what others think.
The Basis
Panzergrenadiers are Ostheer's advanced/elite infantry. Armed with assault rifles they perform well at mid-range against infantry with the capacity to also deal strong close-range DPS that meshes well with their Bundle Grenade. These traits make them good at defending support weapons and forcing enemies to keep at distance where Grenadiers or MG 42s can do the heavy lifting.
When armed with Panzerschrecks, they can deliver large amounts of burst damage and make potent support against flanking vehicles or forcing away units like tank destroyers.
Deployed from the Leichte Mechanized Kompanie, they can arrive when what could be considered the late early-game early-mid game is beginning.
Problems
Timing: Panzergrenadiers arrive at a later stage in the game outside certain strategies. By this point, other infantry are getting weapons and/or veterancy, but the biggest thing is that their arrival time coincides when Ostheer generally has 4 squads of Grenadiers who are likely arming with LMGs, veterancy, along with support weapons.
Combined with the fact Grenadiers are easier to micro with their ranged weapons and have utility in the form of snares, it's hard to justify adding them in when you got most of what you need from T1 for your infantry.
Competition in the Tier: T2 has many options for Ostheer to go with. The most chosen first units tend to be light vehicles as they allow Ostheer to go on the offensive and/or punish lone squads, especially those which lack snares or AT weapons.
Panzergrenadiers, meanwhile have all the weaknesses of infantry and will bleed if not handled correctly. They also don't start hitting their stride until veterancy 2-3 and cannot sit back like Obersoldaten.
To make Panzergrenadiers an AT option, you need a lot of munitions which means delays on the medical bunker so its often better to deploy earlier pak guns that also have use in the mid-late game and have a range advantage. You generally will not see early Panzerschrecks; LMGs to win the infantry war and the medical bunker all compete. This munition cost creates choices and delays and should be kept.
Difficult to Use Versus Alternatives: Panzergrenadiers are not a squad you can throw at the enemy in any shape or form. They need to pick their engagement ranges, figure out how to avoid fire on the way in and they be able to stay in the area long enough to deal their damage. Unlike Grenadiers, they don't have the advantage of needing to just keep the enemy at a distance, but they do compensate with having better DPS at the mid-short range can beat units Grenadiers would have issues with at short-range.
Still, in most cases, good MG 42 micro combined with Grenadier's good LMG DPS allows Ostheer to deal damage at distance and forces the enemy to close rather than the other way around which is more difficult for all assault infantry. No one wants to approach PGs and will keep distance where the squad is weakest unlike Grenadiers who have the MG 42 to protect them from assault units.
G43s Need a Revamp: G43s, while very good at chasing down hostiles with minimal DPS lose on the move, along with changing the squad's damage to deal high damage per shot, does not have major improvements. In fact, G43s make them weaker at short-mid range by a considerable margin. Their advantages do not kick in soon enough over the StG 44 unless you want that +7 sight for spotting.
Ideas
This is me throwing out random ideas. I'm not sure how this unit would see more play without becoming broken without extreme drastic overhauls.
Headquarters Unit after Battlephase: My biggest personal issue with PGs over all others, is timing. When I need to field the MG 42 along with 3-4 Grenadiers in a traditional build before teching up, I really don't need to be fielding more infantry when LMGs allow the Ostheer infantry to compete during the later stages of the mid-game and allow me to hand back.
Being in the HQ means they are not competing as heavily with all the T2 units that are so valuable and it might open new strategies where one holds out for BP 1 with fewer forces or more support weapons. It's somewhat similar to Osttruppen and Assault Grenadiers into T2, but it's more for rushing out a different kind of infantry.
Population Reduction: They're elite/advanced infantry, but given the difficulties to get them into combat, I don't think they need to be 9. Reducing them to 8 I do not think would encourage spam given they lack proper snares, need munitions for AT weapons, and don't have the long-range DPS or Rifle Grenades to destroy HMGs like Grenadiers do.
G43s: Equip the entire squad with G43 Rifles and then boost their mid-range so the advantage over the StG 44 doesn't start at range 25-28. The weapon remains a trade-off, but allow them to have a decisive advantage at a greater range over the the standard StG 44.
What are Yours Ideas?
What do others think of on the unit? PGs, themselves and their stats, I feel are fine as they are a unit that requires some thought to use and have specific purposes. I just think they just come in at a point where the core roster is saturated with a large number of starting infantry, existing choices in infantry/support weapons and competition in their own tier where shock units and/or manpower-based AT weapons take precedence over the unit.
|
Imo that is no justification in making Shock troops OP. If guards are OP they should be nerfed and not the other way round.
You keep throwing out the word without seemingly to know its connotations. How are Shocks OP in any form even now? They still don't want to fight at mid-range as it means other units can be brought up to support versus them.
They are a dedicated AI squad that needs to be positioned and cannot be A-moved like LMG units. Sure, they can 1v1 most other squads, but everything else hardcounters them its easier to keep at range than it is for them to close distance, even with smoke. |