Profile of RMMLz

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 27 Dec 2013, 16:54 PM
Last Visit Time: 28 Mar 2024, 23:06 PM
Website: https://shaderweb.com/en
Residence:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Nationality:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Timezone: Asia/Tehran
Game Name: <HOJAT>RMMLz

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Nostalgia Thread11 Nov 2015, 15:36 PM HMG42... In: Lobby
Thread: Vehicle pathing 11 Nov 2015, 15:18 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2015, 14:46 PMIJHicks_XI Some of the pathing issues relate to the capture points too. This. Vehicles should phase through CPs and VPs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: An idea to replace buyable commanders10 Nov 2015, 15:41 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2015, 23:35 PMSturmtigerCobra Snip I like how you have good knowledge about the RTS/MOBA market and back them up with data. I totally agree with you. Relic/SEGA (whoever the culprit is) still doesn't have a good business model for the game as far as I can tell, and I think they've moved on and are working on other projects, and they are just milking out the last drops from CoH2. CoH2 sales are just extra money in their pocket. This is the only acceptable explanation, how else can we justify their poor balance choices, sloppy patches, input delay, poor performance etc. If they wanted this game to become a popular e-sports title, they would act a lot faster. I'm not saying it's bad, only pointing out that I think they are working on another project, full time. PS: I hereby ask this community (specially our trivia and news lord Nigod) to follow Relic on instagram (Relicentertainment), Maybe you can find a clue about what they are up to. In: Lobby
Thread: Why do S mines have signs?10 Nov 2015, 14:39 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 14:26 PMTheSleep3r I can't believe no one wants to add suppression to all mines I want Infantry Reactions back. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: King Tiger 10 Nov 2015, 14:27 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 10:36 AMausterlitz @Commissar Katitof, ... Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 10:29 AMKatitof @ostherlitz ... Daaaym I spilled my coffee all over the keyboard. Keep it up guys. In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger 9 Nov 2015, 22:02 PM It's just not the best unit for 1s, deal with it. I know your frustration, both Axis factions are UP at them moment. This makes you seek a WildCard iWin Anti Everything tank to turn the tide and win the game after like 20 minutes of frustrating struggle against RifleDerps. Point is, a supported KT (mostly in 2s+) is a beast. It really is. If OKW is overhauled/tweaked/buffed you would not need a better KT. Imagine if other units had better synergy with the current KT, what would happen then? So I think you want KT to be more powerful to compensate other flaws, which is not the way to balance OKW. OKW needs a total overhaul, and apparently relic is willing to do that. In: Lobby
Thread: Penals weaker than conscripts??9 Nov 2015, 15:19 PM Far too expensive for what they do... and what they do exactly? They don't have an exact role, specially now that their satchel charge is a glorified grenade. Are they main line infantry? No, lack of long range DPS and too expensive. Are they elite infantry? No, not enough utility and not enough DPS. They do have some of the best vet bonuses of the game, granted. But still they are lackluster, lose models, and as I said, don't actually have e role. I would say either give them AVT upgraded (unlikely) or simply increase their long range Accuracy and DPS. Soviets already have good CQC units (Shocks, Partysans, PPSH Cons or even vanilla cons). I would recommend buffing their long range DPS, and adjusting their vet in a way that they can pull their weight against Vet3 LMG grens. Increase their reinforce price if needed (Not sure how expensive their reinforcement is). Oh, also remove the flamethrower. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 4v4 can't be balanced, they said9 Nov 2015, 14:18 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2015, 13:29 PMElSlayer More variables to balance for devs and numbers to remember for players. Design anti-pattern IMO. I don't think so. Right now, the game is a mess. 4v4 is the most played mode, but 1s (and sometime 2s) are considered "e-sports" material ( ). Most 4v4 roflstomp heroes also don't play 1s and 2s, and vice versa. Besides, the only changes could be unit price and timing, and that's it, you don't have to memorize so many numbers and stats. I don't play 3s and 4s, but I think simply changing price on some units would be a big step towards balance. Anyway, they've stated that they don't have any plans regarding different game modes so arguing it is pointless. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 4v4 can't be balanced, they said9 Nov 2015, 13:18 PM But 1s and 2s... I don't understand, why they don't just design different game modes for 3s and 4s? It would be a lot easier to balance without affecting 1s and 2s. Different income, unit pricing or even unit performance. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: ISU-152 feels really weak9 Nov 2015, 13:14 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2015, 09:02 AMatouba But the ISU has 70 range, 10 more than the SU85. The SU85 has 0 AI. And you have medium tanks which support the ISU. I feel its accuracy against infantry at max range is underperforming now so I said it could use a slight buff. Only sucks when the ISU is shooting from low ground. This is a universal issue with all explosive shells. But ISU firing from high ground wipes squads with ease. In: COH2 Balance