Profile of Relaxx666677676

Avatar Area

Offline Norway
Posts: 134

General Information
Email: vatr.qnivqfra(wsa)tznvy.pbz
Register Time: 18 Nov 2012, 23:55 PM
Last Visit Time: 19 Nov 2019, 12:48 PM
Website: http://ec-coh.com/news.php
Steam: 76561198037763755
Birthday: 1968-06-07
Residence:

Ireland
Nationality:

Norway
Timezone: UTC
Game Name: Relaxx666677676, ECRelax

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Mirror Match13 Dec 2012, 13:34 PM Say you're playing a BO3 Wehr vs Wehr mirror match to find the best player. Unless the map is totally symmetrical one starting position will be better than the other, so you switch sides in the second match. It's a draw after two games. How do you decide who plays from which position in the last game? How is this any different from the current BO3 situation? In: Lobby
Thread: ALPHA test FORUM13 Dec 2012, 00:27 AM I hope for his sake that they'll have a better system in place for beta. In: Lobby
Thread: ALPHA test FORUM12 Dec 2012, 21:57 PM He has to pass the names to the host as well. In: Lobby
Thread: ALPHA test FORUM12 Dec 2012, 21:07 PM You just have to be patient. The NDA does not allow any discussion here. It is frustrating not being able to give feedback but the alpha is for stress testing mainly. In: Lobby
Thread: Mirror Match12 Dec 2012, 19:35 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2012, 18:16 PMMorrissey'sQuiff It would completely eliminate the archaic "BO3s and deciding factions by VP count" system that plagued CoH tournaments. Under that system matches could be incredibly unbalanced if you were on a map that's particularly good for one faction, yet awful for another. Getting rid of that would be a huge push in the right direction for the tournament/e-sports scene. I see your point but I think that's more due to a lack of decent, balanced maps. Wouldn't all the random stuff in CoH reduce mass appeal for e-sports anyway? It isn't just due to the lack of mirror matches that CoH isn't more popular, is it? In: Lobby
Thread: Mirror Match12 Dec 2012, 18:04 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2012, 17:06 PMMorrissey'sQuiff Mirror matches shouldn't be considered because they'd make for some frivolous doss around games, but because it would help strengthen the competitive scene. If they're going to be added in any form, they should be added in automatch. Otherwise why bother at all? How would it strengthen the competitive scene? You're just stating your opinion without any evidence to back it up. It's also possible that it will drive players away from automatch if implemented. I get that some of the top players would love it but there are also some skeptics. Not all pros seem to be strongly in favour. I'd be happy if they added it in basic but not in automatch. In: Lobby
Thread: Mirror Match12 Dec 2012, 15:54 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2012, 14:32 PMBudwise players having to excel in both Allied and Axis factions brings a higher level of overall play. That's a very good point. A truly great player should be equally adept at all factions. In: Lobby
Thread: Mirror Match12 Dec 2012, 12:41 PM Mirror matches would be fine for basic matches but I don't want it in automatch. The CoH games may not be historically accurate but where's the fun in having to use 5 Shermans to fight a Tiger? Gameplay has to come first obviously so some concessions have to be made. If SNF starts broadcasting mirror matches I will tune out. I don't want to watch Volks vs. Volks and Tigers fight KTs and such nonsense. It just won't feel right. If you don't care about history there are other games out there. Part of what makes CoH awesome is that you can relate to the setting and the units. In: Lobby
Thread: Under/Over on numbers of players?11 Dec 2012, 16:06 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Dec 2012, 02:34 AMChevrolet If Scheldt 2.0 comes with the game: 20k+ Sad but true. In: Lobby
Thread: COH2 Multiplayer London Event Review10 Dec 2012, 18:44 PM Great writeup. In: News