Profile of Ossy

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 42

General Information
Steam: 76561198021723729


Thread: Official Obersoldaten OP Thread23 Jun 2014, 22:22 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2014, 18:25 PMKatitof Wait until you meet these guys, you'll be the first one to recreate this thread. Unless extremely high long range DPS, bonus accuracy against retreating units, fire on the move with LMG, self regen, insane scaling and suppression and with upgrade ignores most of cover sounds balanced to you I thought that their ability to fire on the move was unintentional.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet AT too map and commander call in dependant18 Jun 2014, 00:10 AM I would like to see Guards as core units from T1 instead of Penals. Every tier from every faction has some form of at or units with at-abilities EXCEPT for Soviet T1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No balance... Mines, Snipers...6 Jun 2014, 13:37 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jun 2014, 09:21 AMDavidKh That's very annoying to play with germans... When you hit faust at M3A1 with 2/3 health but it survives, when enemy has 2 snipers(4 men) and you can't kill both of them. When one "free"(30muni) mine kills a squad! When T85's rule against Tiger... Conscripts from green cover and others... ISU152 kills a squad with one pure shot. It's already impossible to play 1v1... That's a shit! 2 snipers are rarely seen in a 1 vs 1 match. Nevertheless a sniper against a 4 man squad is a little too much. Your squad health and firepower is cut down with 25% with one shot In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet tier 1 and 2 design20 May 2014, 23:48 PM I don't know if this has been mentioned before but I wish to express my concerns about how the soviet core army is designed. By this I mean to say how tiers and their respective units. For example if we compare special rifle command and support weapon kampaneya you might as yourself why soviet tier one has no AT at all? You only have a sniper, a scoutcar both usefull units but then you have penals wich are weird. They have no roll, no purpose. I think that guard should replace the penal. Let them come with 6 svt rifles and allow them to be upgraded with a weapn package that enables dp machine guns and better performing ptrs rifles. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Thought about the Penal and Guards Infantry14 May 2014, 23:48 PM I too believe that guards should replace penals. This way the special rifle command will have some at. Penals are very odd anyway. They don't fit any role. Remove them from the game entirely. In: Lobby
Thread: Pumas and Target Weak Point28 Apr 2014, 22:47 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2014, 16:59 PMpqumsieh Use AT guns against the Puma, vehicles are not hard counters. AT guns are. Let us know how this works out. Even if tanks are not the hard counter to the puma they should act as a soft counter to it. the Puma should be able to beat the M3 and the T70 but not medium tanks with such ease. Also the veteran ability is too good for the Puma. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Two new free Commanders today! 28 Apr 2014, 22:43 PM I wish the M5 halftrack assault group contained guards with ppsh and bazookas instead of ptrs In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pumas and Target Weak Point27 Apr 2014, 13:23 PM What makes the puma op is the veteran ability. It should be replaced with something else. Target weakpoint should ony be available for turretless vehicles. They need that ability to disable flanking tanks. But I must also say that the Sherman is too good as well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Make conscripts and grenadiers more equal21 Apr 2014, 23:38 PM Slight cost reduction? Yes please. Not only cons all Soviet units should be cheaper. The manpower drain has become enormous for the Soviets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SAGE BALANCE 1v1 21 Apr 2014, 23:25 PM Now soviets are weak in both early as late game. In fact it is pointless to play as Soviet because you'll lose to lmg42/g43 spam. I really doubt that relic test any patch thoroughly before release. In: COH2 Balance