Thread: ISU-15228 Apr 2014, 17:58 PM
Short memory, huh? Well its started with your post claiming it's easy to kill Elefant with zis+infantry, so i asked for replay, because im curious of these vaccum games.
You're missing the point. If you want to complain about the Elefant start another thread. This thread is about the ISU. |
Thread: ISU-15228 Apr 2014, 17:32 PM
this i got to see, got any replays ?
In 1v1? It's happened to me before. But remind me why we're talking about the Elefant in a thread on the ISU? |
Thread: ISU-15228 Apr 2014, 17:15 PM
AT guns work, but I agree that Soviets could use a more substantial AT infantry unit. Deserves its own thread though.
I disagree, it's the army design, same as Americans from vCOH. It is a different topic though. In any case, even a single infantry-supported Zis can easily take down an Elefant. |
Thread: ISU-15228 Apr 2014, 12:50 PM
If you can circle strafe an ISU with 2 stugs then you are playing against someone that has no idea how to properly support his units.
The Elefant is completely beside the point of this discussion. I haven't played with, or against, the Elefant enough to comment. Start a thread called "Elefant" if you think the Elefant is a problem. This thread is about the ISU.
As for the Brummbar, there is a world of difference between 40 range and 100 range. 40 range puts you face-to-face with an AT gun; 100 range does not. And I've never seen a Brummbar 1-shot a Zis squad. Video please?
Again, I think it was Shazz who said it best: great AI, great AT, extreme range--pick two. (The Elefant that everyone keeps complaining about in this thread only has two, as does the Tiger). |
Thread: ISU-15227 Apr 2014, 22:20 PM
"Apart from the people who disagree with me because they are biased, everybody agrees with me"
Just the pro players.
Now as far as the game goes if you don't have respective tank force when ISU arrives I dare to say that you've lost this game long before this happens.
The game that I played that made me so passionate about this issue was going my way all day until the ISU hit the field... at which point my army evaporated. Did you see the game that got Hans so upset earlier today? It was neck-and-neck vs. cruzz, right up until the ISU hit the field. At that exact moment, he had the strategic initiative.
On a more general note, there is an enormous difference between 1-shotting a squad and 2-shotting a squad. |
Thread: ISU-15227 Apr 2014, 21:59 PM
On a more serious note, it seems both Hans and VonIvan are in favor of nerfing the ISU, at least vs. infantry. So it seems like among those without a huge bias there is a consensus here. |
Thread: ISU-15227 Apr 2014, 21:50 PM
This game is about reflex, fast managment of troops and thats it. Top players dont impress with some well thought out tactics but the responce time they give command to units.
That's right folks, COH is all about the APM. /sarcasm |
Thread: ISU-15227 Apr 2014, 21:30 PM
Still beats you.
In the absence of an actual "ignore" function I will just say that I am no longer responding to you. |
Thread: ISU-15227 Apr 2014, 20:20 PM
I like how you try to argue that lil fact.
Makes me smile irl.
Playercard or GTFO. I don't think you play both factions and I don't think you care about balance, you just want Soviets to have the advantage and I think that's ridiculous. |
Thread: ISU-15227 Apr 2014, 20:05 PM
AoE kills bunched up infantry.
Thats how AoE works.
EDIT:
Katitof why don't you show us your playercard so we can see how many games you play as the respective factions? |