Profile of Vaz

It's funny watching some tanks blitz down roads

when speed > maximum speed

rng engine overheat .2

scale up based on target size

There is a danger of pushing that much weight to those speeds. They did something similar with t34.

They could do the same thing as t34, after blitz engine overheats and tank is stuck for a bit (still allowed to fire though).

engine damage should be disabling it though, I'm not sure if it's allowed, but I think I saw someone blitz an engine damaged tiger away from me recently.

I feel like received accuracy is the stronger one here, since a smart player can use cover to boost that bonus even more. I haven't run the numbers to see which gives more, but getting obers in particular out of cover with small arms is really hard.

Is the received accuracy being applied correctly to falls? I seem to be killing them pretty easy with conscripts. Not that I feel OKW needs any tougher infantry, but some of these fall squads are dying so fast it doesn't feel right to make them cost 400mp (I don't know if that's right, I haven't checked but I've read people say it is).

I think there are some interesting ways that armor can be put in the game without it being OP. Such as being able to tone down some weapons (like LMGS) towards unarmored units (because it's a little stupid right now), and instead provide value in penetration.

I must not be facing any of you in my games. ISU is strong, but not how some here are making it out to be. Especially for OKW. King tiger and especially Jagdtiger are HARD counters to ISU. Don't tell me about the support, that's your job as a player, this isn't a movie that you just sit back and watch. Try outsmarting someone instead of attack move.

I've heard those OKW panzerIV's are crap, but I really haven't seen much of them used.

For Ostheer, it's very counterable. I have never had a game I played as Ostheer and lost it due to ISU. The games I lost, it was usually downhill from the start. EVERY anti tank solution the ostheer has is viable. You can hide a tellar mine in a smart place to help if you need. Pak is 1 shotted by ISU, but Pak should not be sent alone to fight ISU. The same dumb thing happens with ZiS against tigers. Tiger hits and at least 2 crew dead, pintle takes care of the rest. Often tigers will also destroy ZiS, where ISU doesn't destroy pak. You can destroy ISU with pgren shreks, so long as you don't front assault it in a blob. If you actually flank, 2 shrek squads will assure destruction. It's 240 damage per volley per squad, same damage the ISU does. PanzerIV is very viable as is Stug, both can penetrate and PIV can out maneuver ISU easy. Everything non-t4 Ost is better used in multiples and coordinated. This is no different from Tigers and Panthers. I can't take 1 t34/85 and expect to attack move on a tiger and win.

Honestly, panthers are a hard counter. Not 2, but just 1. The range, armor, maneuverability, rate of fire. The ISU is not better than the panther in armor battles. If you can flank it, you have a pretty good chance of not even getting hit. Support? Both players should have support.

For being such a huge, slow, hulk, the ISU is amazingly easy to penetrate with Axis anti-tank weapons. On the other side, Axis armor is not so easy and blocks a lot of shots. I don't even know why there are comparisons of ZiS vs Jt. How a Zis got in range of Jt? Someone is having micro errors.

There needs to be more replays uploaded or videos or some sort of proof for these odd claims of ISU deleting whole armies and players being powerless to stop it. I think a lot of players here are consistently failing throughout the game and ISU is just the final nail in the coffin for some of you, so it becomes your justification.

Well, it doesn't fit into the meta right now. Trying to hold positions like this with OKW in the game are just not valid. Their damage output at long ranges is too much. Combined with fast stuka to break the building, it just isn't worth it. Since no one is interested in losing massive amounts of cons anymore, there is no value in the fhq right now.

Rostov needs balancing. One side has to go over bridges. The other has large amount of land. It's not fair.

The larger maps need to have a more coherent feeling in some of them. City17 is a great example. Spawning 2 groups far from each other typically devolves the game into two 2v2's or worse in 6 player there ends up being two 2v1's. Make the player bases closer to each other so everyone is complementing each other and encouraged to work together. Some maps should have the base buildings moved further into the map to reduce time spent traveling to action.

Make cut-off more possible and rewarding in the larger maps.