Profile of coh2player

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1571

General Information


Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies5 Jun 2014, 20:22 PM http://blogs.companyofheroes.com/category/unit-profiles/ Tune in tomorrow for a CoH2: The Western Front Armies Shoutcast at 1 PM PST / 9 PM GMT - http://www.twitch.tv/relicentertain In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger infos5 Jun 2014, 19:14 PM ^ King Tiger is non-doctrinal heavy tank for OKW Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2014, 19:09 PMBurts I dunno, i swear i circlestrafed an unsupported tiger just a few matches, i will try to find a replay. From experience I attack supported tigers (usually they are supported) with 3 x T-34/76s. I only need 2 x T-34/85 with marked target. In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger infos5 Jun 2014, 19:07 PM Tigers are used with faust grens and a pak as overwatch. A faust will connect. Tigers are micro'ed backwards and the whole body is shifted so the turret rotates faster. In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger infos5 Jun 2014, 18:21 PM So they didn't buff the rear all that much. You can take down a Tiger I with 2 x T-34/76s? That's a close call. I'm thinking more like 3 to get the kill. In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger infos5 Jun 2014, 18:04 PM I'm thinking that the rear armor on the Tiger II will probably counter (or render low effectiveness) the gunfire from every non-heavy tank besides the M36. In: Lobby
Thread: IS25 Jun 2014, 16:56 PM Is 2 is supposed to have 205 rear armor while pak does 190. Somehow it feels like the pak does pen it quite a bit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: King Tiger infos5 Jun 2014, 16:54 PM Simpson is probably going to do a US tank reveal soon. Maybe the M36 ? In: Lobby
Thread: How do I send Imperial Dane Replays?5 Jun 2014, 16:46 PM Dane is a good player but he never uses Medic bunkers or medics because he thinks it's unimportant. It's odd as I can't think of a single reason not to. In: Lobby
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies5 Jun 2014, 16:20 PM Looks good, although it will be expensive. Probably only 1 can be realistically fielded vs. 2 Tigers max for ostheer. I can kind of figure out how the unit is going to be as the Tiger I was very OP during the first few months of coh2. It's going to be slower in all aspects than the Tiger I. But it's have a great main gun with penetration that exceeds the Panther's. (240) Front armor will be even higher than the Tiger I. So I'm most curious about its rear armor. The Tiger I already has a pretty good rear (180) but the Tiger II would have an even better one. The IS-2's rear is 205. So maybe the Tiger II will have a rear that's between 300-250? Basically, its rear may be like the Tiger I's front. In: Lobby
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies5 Jun 2014, 05:39 AM I never played the campaign. I find Shock troops and penal squad designs to be muddled. I'd like it like this: Assault Engineer: 6 man squad with ppsh, 1 flamethrower 60 muni, satchel charge, mine sweeper Soviet veteran infantry: 6 man squad with SVTs, DPs, smoke, molotov, AT grenade Penal Squad: 6 man squad with mosin, molotov, multiple grenade throws (like AG), multiple AT nade throws. Of course, all will have appropriate costs, require munitions or teching. The idea with my penal squad is to use them to do suicidal things like attack P4s or infantry blobs with close contact. They only have mosins, and have to rely on explosives tossing. Soviet veteran infantry is the typical good tactical squad (comparable to US veteran infantry). Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2014, 03:00 AMMr. Someguy Shock Troops are Assault Engineers, also Penals should have been Frontoviki, I wish they were. Also Frontoviki in campaign were misused, Frontoviki means "Veterans", but in campaign they're used as throwaway infantry. T1 Penals are more like Frontoviki since they are armed with SVT's and are better than Conscripts. In: Lobby