Soviets can be good enougth to play against other factions specially in 1vs1 if you play in a really specific way and thats the problem, they have the biggest amout of useles units, vet abilities, commanders. and in some cases they are strigth worst, like in air abilities with the suply drops or the il2 strafes, or the ninja buf of the stuka.
Dont agree? lets see.
Flares, button, m42, kv1, kv2, shermanC (comes at cp10!), cap territory, all tier1, tier 4 not prepared for late game, hit the dirt, il2 atack and specially il2 single strafe, rapid conscripation, b4, the balanced katyusha (so balanced that its worst than every single roket artillery in the game) not upgradeable conscripts, granade side costs, ultra long animations for granades and penal charges.
And those are the worst ofenders a lot of units and abilities are in need of small adjustments. |
su as S.U. soviet union facepalm will chage the title my bad
Indeed all the units of my list are S.U. units ... |
stay on topic we are about a tier and build changes not all the unused unit in the game
Sorry the thread name is "SU changes".
Su85 lower fire rate, with more pen, damage and speed. |
Need changes:
M42.
B4.
Kv1.
T34/76.
M3.
Sherman.
Penals.
IL2.
Hit the dirt.
Rapid conscripation.
Ram.
Flare mines.
Cap territory.
Need adjustments:
Dshk.
Guard infantry (buton, mines, weapon drops).
Is2.
katyusha or the other rest of roket artillery.
Pop cap (120 mortar and others).
Others.
Su85 could be more late game oriented, and t34/76 replaced by 85.
With the improved inf spread shocks have more difficulties using smoke grenades properly. |
Kv1 should be more like the churchill or have better abilities like the german hull down. |
Replace this pop corn shooter with 100mm BS3 working similar to Pak43.
Now we are talking, those 2 commanders have nothing for late game. the bs was capable of making indirect fire if I recall correctly, for a healthy amount of ammo it could be the special asset of this unit compared with the pak.
how About replace zis-3 on this 57mm anti-tank gun M1943 (ZiS-2)
plenty lot more anti tank,,, whit out barrage,,, And move doctrinal zis-3 to replace old 45mm
Please stop.
|
Replace it with t34/85. |
Frankly, it doesn't, its more efficient to just get T2 and ZiS.
By the time you can get M-42, you don't need it any more, much like conscript PTRS.
Agree.
i am just new guy here but, replace zis-3 non doctire m-42 at and put zis-3 under doctrines + reduce cost of barrage every one happy... maybe not aaa + katioff just my 2 cents of the i just play okw and my player card sucks...
NO. |
I've used it from time to time to troll in custom matches, but never seriously. IMO, it should be more like a long-range T70 gun on wheels to give it some unique flavor and purpose. Or a Rak clone.
Agree, make it like a static T70, increase the price to reflect the performance, it should be okish at cp2. |
Single strafe version is even worst, it fails to make damage even with direct hits. |