Profile of Dullahan

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1384

General Information
Steam: 76561197997530183
Timezone: America/Edmonton


Thread: How to use Medics20 Apr 2016, 17:55 PM Being efficient In: Replays
Thread: Baneblade can't cap20 Apr 2016, 16:55 PM Ridiculous game. In: Replays
Thread: April 20th Update20 Apr 2016, 15:10 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2016, 15:05 PMRedT3rror Getting both will cost you a good amount of manpower and time. 320 mp and 35 fuel. It's about 90 seconds of resources, plus the build time which is like 15 seconds. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April 20th Update20 Apr 2016, 14:38 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2016, 14:02 PMMarcus2389 I am all in favour of a nerf to Maxims, but Soviets T1 should be then made more viable, especially the M3A1 and considering the tier itself doesn't provide any AT tool (so you are subject to suffer against both Luchs and 222s and you are pretty much always forced to go Guards - which I think are overperforming when played correctly) Just build the 160/20 T2... You don't have to commit to one or the other. Getting both is pretty straightforward. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: A radical idea to rebalance T-34/7620 Apr 2016, 14:13 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2016, 14:09 PMFul4n0 Put penals in t2, same tier as zis gun, and then, you will see how people field one or two penals same as Ostheer players field one or two pgreens... Teching to t1 just to get "one" penal squad is not worth at all in my nooob opinion.... Having t1 lets you get snipers as well, or even a scout car. I usually do T1 + t2 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A radical idea to rebalance T-34/7620 Apr 2016, 13:40 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2016, 05:55 AMAustralian Magic Oh, of course Penals can be useful. I did triple Penals strat many times but after 10-12mins they start to become useless thanks to their squishy character so in the end they cannot become your mainline infantry through enitre game like Volks, Grens, Tommies or Rifles etc. Making weak unit 1-2mins faster to hit the field is just lazy solution to make this weak unit look stronger but after initial pressure, it will still remain weak, with no purpose. You should try mixing just 1 penal into 2-3 conscripts. No reason to go exclusively penals, but having it there to complement them works well imo. I find it's worth having one on the field just because of how great they are in close range, they make an excellent flanking squad, especially once they get oorah. Makes a big difference in early to mid game fights. Satchel charges are amazing too. It's like pgrens. They're shock troops, you don't really want them to be your exclusive infantry but having one or two is great. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brits as Early Game Infantry Faction20 Apr 2016, 13:36 PM Going for a strong T1 works fine as brits as long as you get PIATs, pairing with tankhunters would be solid. In: UKF Strategies
Thread: 30muni mine balance20 Apr 2016, 01:27 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2016, 00:20 AMDomine Can't relic just code it in a way that One model leaves the building first, then 1 second after the rest of the squad follows? It's realistic and would solve the problem instantly. Until it's a machine gun... I wonder if it would set up when the first man left the house and break the game? And not to mention how that will work with grenades. Machine guns already have a tight window to dodge grenades, this would make it even tighter. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A radical idea to rebalance T-34/7620 Apr 2016, 01:18 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2016, 20:51 PMAustralian Magic I don't like making it more fuelwise expensive but avaible from T3. It will change nothing. It still will be the worse medium in game by a far. It's like making Penals 220MP and avaible from T0. Earlier, cheaper but still not useful. I think you'd find if you actually used things you'd find out what they're good at for them. Penals are better than cons in almost every way as a fighting unit, dealing nearly double the damage up close, beating out both volks and grenadiers. At 220MP and T0 they would excel greatly. Likewise, a T-34/76 coming out a minute or two after an AEC or a stuart would be a pretty big deal. It is better than both of those units in nearly every way. Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2016, 19:45 PMferwiner I like the 210/100fu idea, it would both support less used doctrines late game and blend well into 1 heavy tank limitation of used doctrines that leaves lots of fuel to spend. It copies the unique feature of t-70, but in same faction and different tier so its ok IMO. You're trading half a minute of manpower for almost minute of fuel... cost correlates to time. Unless you're massively bleeding manpower due to bad engagements, you're not saving any time but instead decreasing the speed at which you can produce t-34's. In the hyper late game where manpower income is reduced but you're floating fuel because you haven't built anything other than an IS-2, sure that makes some sense. But that's really not the scenario we should be pricing the t-34/76 for. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Don't chase penal battallions around corners.20 Apr 2016, 00:45 AM A quick lesson in satchel charges. In: Replays