Profile of Dullahan

Fun game, pretty rough match up for this match but overall was fun.

Should have built an elefant though...

If you think of the Anvil nerfs in context of playing with emplacements, then yeah they will still work fine, and cost increases are not too bad.

If you intended to just spam these two units, then yeah you wont have much muni or fuel

I agree, but I'd much rather they just increased the cost on sappers to something like 250-260 mp and given it like a 30 muni cost.

Sappers are pretty OP at 210 mp. They're almost on par with sturmpios, especially with the five man upgrade.

Experimenting with NKVD Doctrine. Really loving the propaganda arty.

1. Read what support is. I defined it, first paragraph. Radio intercept is sorta good at supporting your teammates. Sorta. Recon planes are good as well, not 5 stars trololol because recon planes!!

The strength of NKVD is being able to force retreat or pin your opponent. Not only does it win fights, but it prevents your opponent from capping vp's willy nilly. Terror Tactics is the more well rounded doctrine I think, but I like the combination or radio intercept/recon, because information is power in this game.

I'm simply not gonna sit here and BS people telling them that the likes of NKVD is actually good, no matter how much you try to educate or troll me on awful abilities. The first paragraph also says that "we encourage you to try them all to fit your style" if your style is losing because you picked a shit commander, then enjoy losing. I'm not here to stop you.

This is such a closed minded stance to have when it comes to RTS. You should be looking on the good side of "underwhelming" abilities and trying to figure out how you could use them. You'd be surprised how often this leads to a strong new strategy.

And 2, again if you read the first paragraph every available ability was weighed from everything with the faction itself in mind, to how the other abilities worked together with the other abilities in the same doctrine.

I mean with actual numbers, not your ass. There's so much crossover in abilities between Ost/Sov commanders that I don't believe you. Some that have 3/5 of the same abilities as top tier commanders are bottom tier commanders. (Ex: Festung Armour Really? Nothing wrong with this doctrine.)

And 3, thanks for the compliment, I love writing shit descriptions. Achter wrote the OKW ones so you might want to compliment him directly.

Want me to break it down for you? They're shit descriptions because you got lazy with anything you considered crap. Want an example? See: Encirclement doctrine. "Scary stormtroopers.....and a very hard to execute Encirclement ability. Its hard to grade this commander fairly."

The fuck does this tell me about anything about this doctrine and why you placed it in tier 4? There's plenty of similar descriptions that seem to just say "Yo this doctrine is bad nothing to say here".

The USF AT gun does need them every time a tank shows up mate, that or it's bounce bounce bounce. Not fine

57mm has 140/125/115 penetration. Which means even at long range it will reliably penetrate medium tanks and anything weaker.

It has better penetration than a t-34/76, which is a unit that does just fine against medium armour. The only medium tank to give it a run for its money (50% penetration) is the OKW PzIV at 234 armour.