Profile of Dullahan

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1384

General Information
Steam: 76561197997530183
Timezone: America/Edmonton


Thread: Purpose of Thompson vehicle crews11 Jul 2014, 18:35 PM It basically gives you sturmpios. I think the thompson's are overpriced at 90 munitions though. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Fighting Positions11 Jul 2014, 17:29 PM Basicslly, I build 4 rear echelon squads and use the Manpower I save to build a munitions cache early on. Then I get BARS, an ambulance and then go lieutenant tech. I use fighting positions to win super early fights. the main avantages are economical. I have crazy map control early on since RE squads have a very short build time. I usually go airborne with it for paratroopers. I don't know of it's viable, especially on maps with easy cutoffs, but it's won me a few games So far against medium Rank player (300-500) In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Infantry Blobs11 Jul 2014, 04:51 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jul 2014, 03:32 AMPorygon Sent request, when can we blob the crap out of you? Looking like tomorrow night. BE THERE OR BE SQUARE, SON. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry Blobs11 Jul 2014, 03:22 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jul 2014, 03:07 AMreefermadness Not saying suppression will beat them alone but it should SUPPRESS them. A vet 2 maxim in yellow cover should not have trouble pinning 4 squads that are literally grouped together. Instead it supresses the first two. Did you manually target the unsuppressedsquads? The maxim has a rather weak AoE suppression compared to the mg34. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Changes11 Jul 2014, 01:30 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jul 2014, 01:10 AMYouGetGot Watching my MGs getting picked off like Riflemen are snipers is PAINFUL. 2 squads focus fire on that and they just dominate even if the MG is supported. I agree, I was always against the 25% damage bonus weapon crews take. You have to use mg's very cautiously with cover. Garrison cover is damn near necessary. Jump back to quoted post10 Jul 2014, 23:34 PMMr. Someguy If the Quadmount and Flame Half-Track are both T3, why is this death machine, superior to both aforementioned Half-Tracks, in T2? They're upgrades for existing halftracks that provide reinforcement in addition to their weapon. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: RE Army 211 Jul 2014, 01:27 AM Really enjoying this build. It's challenging in the first few minutes, but I'm finding it far more economical than a traditional build. The shear amount of resources I have due to caches and map control is crazy storng, and the veterancy on rear echelon squads is actually decent. In: Replays
Thread: Fighting Positions11 Jul 2014, 00:54 AM It's worth noting that you can still garrison the position even with an MG in it. (Or atleast I upgraded one with a squad in it and it didn't boot them out) They're fragile though, that's for sure. I've been using them heavily in my No riflemen builds. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Ambulance Not Reinforcing?11 Jul 2014, 00:48 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Jul 2014, 22:57 PMTychoCelchuuu Also if it's "in combat" it can't reinforce, so if there's fighting around it, it won't work. I've been able to reinforce in combat before, just no healing. Maybe they have to shoot the ambulance or something, I dunno. Worst case is you just pull back a few yards. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: AT-Nades causing Engine DMG like 90% of the time11 Jul 2014, 00:17 AM The annoying thing with AT grenades is that Hoorah makes it really easy to hit with, since the animation is irrelevant when they can outrun most vehicles. I don't think it's imbalanced though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rear Echelon Tactics11 Jul 2014, 00:14 AM I'm refining this build. Ignore my shitty vehicle micro though. I don't think this will work against anyone who just pushes my cut off, but it works well against people who think I'm going for a vehicle rush or something. In: Replays