Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: IS-2 Frontal Armor 31 Jul 2014, 07:32 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 20:19 PMCardboard Tank Still, the frontal armor issue with the IS-2 doesn´t seem to be that uncommon. In that engagement a lone IS-2 escapes the crossfire of a King Tiger, Raketenwerfer and Schreck - sidehits on short range included. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiaIlJmrJ14&list=UUyUcNdOxXcVt3o9eZKdza9w#t=30m0s I saw the replay and ALL SHOTS were frontal hits. 29:40 KT frontal . Pen. 29:47 KT frontal . Crew shock 30:07 KT frontal . Pen. 30:11 Rak frontal . Bounce 30:13 KT frontal . Miss/Bounce 30:19 KT frontal . Bounce 30:25 KT frontal . Bounce 30:27 Rak frontal . Bounce KT: Pen 240-200 Armor 425/225 Chance - 64%-53.3% / 100%-97.56% IS2: Pen 250-190 Armor 375/205 Chance - 58.82%-44.7% / 100%-84.4% From 6 shots, 2 penetrated, 1 crit, 1 might have missed and the other 2 bounced. FOR those % it´s just slightly unlucky RNG. Bonus: take a look at the IS2 shot at 30:20. You would expect that to be a frontal hit right? Take a better look. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comparison of Kat & Stuka after heavy usage31 Jul 2014, 07:09 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2014, 01:50 AMPorygon Or just Lend Lense fuel drop / Windustry 5 Kat by double Soviet in Semois is very viable. You can't even pass the choke reaching the Kat blob. Yeah i forgot to ask also which map. But since he said he killed 5 of them, i assume it was another map with flanking routes. Since he said he control both fuels, it can´t be Semoisky (summer he should have pinned the enemy on his base and on winter on a similar degree). We can also speculate and remove from this Minsk n maybe Karkhov. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comparison of Kat & Stuka after heavy usage31 Jul 2014, 00:55 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2014, 00:37 AMOZtheWiZARD Fuel caches. 5 Katyushkas fielded by 2 guys or just 1 ? What were you doing with the "extra" mp spent on caches? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Laser-Homing AT Grenades and Rifle Grenades31 Jul 2014, 00:50 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2014, 00:40 AMDeath's Head Yeah...because games are won and lost because of a couple rifle nades.... Mines wins game, don´t lose squads. If an AT Nade/Faust penetrates or not can be enough reason to determinate the result of a match. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: US faction able to go at will over population cap (normal?)30 Jul 2014, 16:09 PM Exponential mp upkeep raise after 100popcap. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Suggestions for Future balance changes30 Jul 2014, 15:48 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 07:31 AMCabreza You are actually correct Retaliation. Vetlolcake plagiarized a balance post by C0ffeebeanz on the official forums then inserted his own opinions on top of it. You can find C0ffeebeanz post here. Try to spot all the differences! For the lazy. "O.K.W. Kubelwagon -needs more range, or time to suppress should be reduced from 3 seconds to 2 Panzer II 'Luchs' -cost should be reduced from 50 to 40 FU Panther -cost should be reduced from 175 to 155 FU Panzerfusiliers -cost should be increased from 290 to 310 MP to better reflect their performance Obersoldaten -MG34 long range DPS should be reduced Ostheer 222 Armored Car -needs HP buff and cost increase to balance against USF light vehicles 251 Flame half-track -flamethrower upgrade should be unlocked at T2 again Panzergrenadiers -need armor buff to 1.2 Panther -cost should be reduced from 175 to 155 FU Panzerwerfer -needs AoE buff like the Katyusha Brummbar -cost should be reduced from 160 to 140 FU to make it more viable for smaller games U.S.F. Riflemen -M1 Garand long range DPS should be reduced to balance against Grenadiers M15A1 half-track -needs to have a set-up time like the FlaK half-track M1919 -upgrade cost should be increased from 60 to 80 MU 'Easy 8' Sherman -cost should be increased to 400 MP and 145 FU and CP increased to 10 WC51 "Jeep" -CP should be increased from 0 to 1 Soviets Penal Battalions -SVT-40 long range DPS should be increased to better distinguish them from Conscripts SU-76 -cost should be reduced from 70 to 55 FU T-70 -cost should be reduced from 70 to 60 FU Katyusha -damage needs to be reduced from 160 to 100 and AoE reduced from 6 to 5 ISU-152 -scatter should be increased from 8.7 to 12 and AoE reduced from 6 to 5 Guards -should be able to buy back dropped weapons" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Army Choice30 Jul 2014, 15:28 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 15:19 PMm00 I think it's far easier to learn how to play axis over allies, not saying they are better by any means. Just easier to learn and play in my experience. You are right, but he said he has some sort of experience with all the factions. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Comparison of Kat & Stuka after heavy usage30 Jul 2014, 15:27 PM Not again with this thread Eventhough i´m waiting for a a new patch to fix it, just like everyone else. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Repair Criticle is such bs30 Jul 2014, 15:06 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 00:49 AMDeath's Head Blitz never "ignored" engine damage but it helped the damaged vehicle move faster than a snail. It would let you move at NORMAL SPEED (or even faster ?) if it was normal engine damage. Do not try to minimize it. Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 02:27 AMnee Other factions have similar methods though, namely the Soviet T-70's self-repair, their doctrinal Repair Station as well as Conscript Repair for a number of commanders. Elite Armoured Doctrine for OKW also allows self-repair, but it is an inferior, decrewable version of the T-70's. T70 won´t repair you from a faust. It will help you survive a 2nd shot from a pak for example. I´m gonna say it again, increase the price and MAYBE a bit the time on activation (dunno what is it now). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Army Choice30 Jul 2014, 14:58 PM What modes were you playing, compstomp or teamgame modes ? If the 2nd, at which level? If you don´t want to start as US, play Soviets. If you are "brave", go OH. If you have balls, go OKW. In: COH2 Gameplay