Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: To Abandon or not to Abandon4 Dec 2015, 15:54 PM Apply immobilize/heavy engine damage. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Give Brits AT Snare With Nade Tech4 Dec 2015, 00:54 AM Correct me if i'm wrong, but doesn't the UKF sniper "snare" only crits engine on light vehicles ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Weapon racks for Germans or remove them completely?3 Dec 2015, 20:47 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2015, 20:41 PMDullahan Nothing in Coh2's history even approaches these sorts of massive balance issues that other games in the genre have had. It's Relic's most balanced game by far at this point in its life. I'm not saying we are not in mostly a fine state but you can't just ignore what we have endure. -FHT meta or how hitting vet2 suddenly double HP -ISU vs Elephant meta -First week of Osstruppen and AssGrens -TA, Windustry and other attrocities. -Clowncar sniper -T70 with crush -Double damage Katyushas And many more. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rocket Artillery3 Dec 2015, 18:10 PM Duplicate In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IL2/Stuka single strafe run tracking bug3 Dec 2015, 17:38 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2015, 17:12 PMImagelessbean Didn't you point this out like 2 months ago? I see it remains unfixed. Yeah, but lately Relic has been checking this section. So i'll rather have it here. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Chuko's gameplay, balance and fix for SU 1.03 Dec 2015, 16:52 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2015, 11:11 AMvasa1719 I like somthing, somthing not, but need more love for some soviet docs and units, first of al its defencive tacticks. Imo 45 mm can garnison like raketen in house, why not ? While i thought about this change, the weight and size of both units is what it makes it different. Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2015, 11:08 AMBlackart Great idea to alow Soviets to build bunkers (now used as soviet base defence) with the Defensive tactics commanders. This commander also should have some late call-in, maybe a KV-2, now it's one of the worst commanders. You should post IL2 Sturmovik single strafe problem in the bug section. That's more of a rework on the current commander roster. I'll rather improve first on the basis of what the commander is meant to be doing rather than making it plain better by adding call in tanks. Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2015, 09:10 AMnewvan I generally like your proposals, but 9cp for double T-34/76 is kinda late, it isn't perform like Wolverine or have useful ability like command PIV to justify CP value. It could be more expensive but have a lower CP to impact shock value, or stay at 9 but have a cheaper price to be more spamable. You can dish out 4 T34-76s for the same cost that OH could bring out 2 PIVs. That's why i don't think it's a good idea to bring the CP count down nor the cost. The T34-76 is already a cheap tank for been gated at T4. To keep it this way is the reason that i went for a bit later CP count (it could still be 10CP as the M4C) and double call, to keep the fuel cost and even lower the mp cost and popcap. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Chuko's gameplay, balance and fix for SU 1.03 Dec 2015, 16:39 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2015, 13:17 PMTAKTCOM Wow. We have 10 CP command Pz.V. Or M4(76) spam. Or even 8CP KV-1. And T-34-76 on 9CP? Just I do not think it's even possible, but you did it. It's even worse secure mode. Know why? Because of the mysterious reason, 45 mm KV-8 have very very very low RoF. With your suggestion how often it would shoot? 4 shoot in minute? Or maybe even 5? Ram on 1 vet? Really? 1-Stug-E is 7CP. M10 is a 8CP. Bulldozer and M4C are 10CP. Power level is balanced. It could be an 8CP single tank, but i prefer the idea of "spamming" T34-76s. The whole point is that you have a spammable 275mp/80f/9pop 640hp tank. The T34 is not as bad as having to actually get T4 to get it. In fact, i'm unsure on how effective Armored assault could be made with this (Shock Frontline 2.0) -KV8 45mm shoots at the same speed as the JPIV or faster than most medium tanks at 5.0s At 50% speed on reload, it would shoot at 7.375s. Similar to M36 or faster than Panther. Reminder that i double pen at close range and while it's still at crap levels, you don't have to overestimate been able to dish out damage on top of the flamethrower. -I made a mistake there. If i remove something i'll mention it. Ram should be above Vet adjustments and i've to copy paste secure mode fix. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IL2/Stuka single strafe run tracking bug3 Dec 2015, 16:16 PM You can see the damage dealt from each strafe and how it's way more effective hitting targets out of it's range. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: OKW Flak Emplacements3 Dec 2015, 16:11 PM -Make them actually suppress. -Improve them so they actually hit their targets -Make it a bit harder to decrew rather than throwing 2 nades. On their actual state, they are not worth the fuel nor the popcap. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Chuko's gameplay, balance and fix for SU 1.03 Dec 2015, 04:18 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2015, 23:27 PMbraciszek Huh. It has been so long since ive used and seen the unit that i forgot that its cheap and can be fielded in large amounts very fast. Its obviously not meant to be a powerful AT weapon, but giving it a different unique property as well would make it be considered for more than just light-medium vehicle harrassment. Maybe then raise the price a bit, and instead of the canister shot suggestion, perhaps then a timed somewhat cheap muni ability which shoots anti-infantry only shells? Im not that big of a fan of canister shot as it led to both the popularity and downfall of the m8 greyhound. I learnt the insides out of the 45mm at gun with the Reddit's speed run challenge Canister shot on the Greyhound is not as scary even if it deals 80dmg. The reason is that they removed the death crit. Canister, HE/fragmentation shell. All it's good if it's not more than a soft AI option. Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2015, 22:43 PMFlying Dustbin The AT round could also do with a bit better penetration. It's not much better than the standard IS-2 which does not need to switch ammo. With the long reload and countdown on switching ammo, plus the removal of far sight, the designated AT round could be improved a bit more to make it better at fighting German late-game tanks. The ISU152 is mostly your squad wiper rather than an AT platform. I feel like is balance atm. If penetration is increased, i'll rather see RoF lower down. A bit more consistency wouldn't be bad. In: COH2 Balance