Profile of elchino7

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 18:06 PMwhitesky00

On the topic of commanders, I think that's because Allied commanders give them something they severely lacked. Pershing by itself was not OP at release, they just prevented the crew from exiting the vehicle, correct? Lack of a strong heavy, pershing. Lack of rocket artillery, calliope, mattress.

When I play German, I don't even select a commander until I need something specific for late game. Why? because I have everything I need generally. Soviets have to select specific commanders to get t34-85s, a heavy, or elite infantry compared to penals and cons. Allies are usually very dependent on commanders. So think about it.

Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2016, 03:26 AMBulgakov

That's plus gren. Why add that into the equation?

I could say t70 with maxim can beat 222 + gren.

But that's irrelevant. The point is that a higher tier unit can be expected to beat a lower tier unit. Tech cost + time delay + reinforce all mean that the unit should perform better than a unit that comes earlier with a lower cost.

Obers can be expected to beat a Brit Inf Section and it makes little sense to complain about that.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2016, 22:26 PMBulgakov

You wouldn't expect 1 T34 to beat 2x Ostheer 222?

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2016, 18:55 PMferwiner

Right. But apart from tiny part of community who is skillful enough to win money in a turney this doesn't matter. The fact that you win against somebody doesn't make you "better" in any way just like loosing doesn't make you "worse". It also isn't a real war and there is nothing you could be fighting for. The whole ladder system is implemented just so you can find a match near your level. And this level is not the measure of your skill, but also items and strategies you use. There is nothing wrong about playing against slightly worse opponents just becouse you play non meta.