Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Could you please reinsert the UKF mortar pit bug?30 Mar 2017, 11:45 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2017, 03:40 AMGrumpy "Fixed an issue where the second mortar belonging to the mortar pit would deal reduced damage while barraging." Don't call it a bug, call it a feature. This is wiping Gren squads like crazy. I tried a 4v4 and it was a shytefest. Hahaha nope. You know why? Cause most people don't bother microing the mortar pit and leave it's on autofire. Barrage means microing the unit, attacking specific targets/locations on a cooldown action. What you are witnessing is just the raw performance of the mortar pit. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Airborne company30 Mar 2017, 03:17 AM Rocket strafe doesn't need to much of a buff, just make it so it doesn't miss as much. Their tracking is based on movement, just like T-Rexes. If you are not a Tiger, JT or KT, they won't hit you if you stay still. About things i would like to see with Airborne: -NOT sure if it would be OP or not, but try with 0 CP Pathfinders. Make them start with cooldown if too early. It's been to long since i used it but IIRC radios are 0 muni and low cd. This could be tweaked if 0CP is "too strong". -Both MG and AT gun shouldn't cost mp and be changed to muni. Just like with the UK commander. The commander was good. It just got replaced when stronger commanders showed up (Rifle-CalliOP-Pershing). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Future Balance Patch Teasers30 Mar 2017, 02:54 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2017, 00:22 AMAugust1996 1. Fix for Sappers and Rear Echelon Flamers? (Not sure what's wrong) The UK built a university and researched flamethrower +2. They are also weightless and can be combined with other upgrades without magical restrictions. USF is stuck with flamethrower +1. Not as strong as UKF but they still bypass equipment restrictions. https://www.coh2.org/topic/51073/sappers-flamethrower-damage-against-cover #scope PD: i want a scope emoji for the forums now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: lol guards over performing!28 Mar 2017, 22:47 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2017, 22:40 PMPedro_Jedi Mod's, close this please? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Economy guide28 Mar 2017, 00:34 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2017, 21:38 PMMistah_S Good points! However, with that last one, it depends on placement. In 4v4 scenario, generally the closest points to base are the first to get caches. This sometimes can turn the tide half way through the match, and effectively stops a closed pocket raid on your team A "decent" team will steam roll you with clowncar/bren carriers early on destroying those precious caches. "Dead bodies don't cap flags and caches don't shoot back" In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Does anyone else think the Comet is bullshit?27 Mar 2017, 15:31 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2017, 13:08 PMle_saucisson_masque ever heard of TF2 ? one of the most played game, makes a damn shit of money to valve without needing to break it. relic could have done same with tank painting, and the decoration on the player card. even add some new skins for units (but keep the same stats), like a SS skin for german grenadier. When people brings this around, they don't consider how REALLY different both companies and games are. An FPS or MOBA has most of your attention or visuals display on your screen all the time. It's easier to see the value of a hat or champion skin than on a unit which you might never be able to field in a game (say heavies skin) Valve makes most of it's money through it's platform, not through their games. FPS are way more popular and have a bigger market than traditional RTS. Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2017, 11:24 AMMr.Smith The other ones are a no-brainer. However, out of curiosity, what part of Ostheer sniper you consider bullshit (that hasn't been fixed by WBP stealth nerfs)? IMO it's more about BS skills rather than OP units in most cases. I think Comets are on the sight of everyone. The only thing i can think about been bs (which i can't remember if it has been fixed) could probably be the 1100% accuracy on incendiary shot which i'll put into the category of bs but fine. Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2017, 15:15 PMVipper Comet is simply OP. Mutlirole, great stat great abilities. The actual problem of the Panther has more do with effectiveness of M-36, firefly and SU-86 to hit penetrate even at the max range of 60. You don't bring PV in order to counter Jackson, FF or Su85s. If they are not effective at range, then you would just make PV to boom rush them. PD: if you actually meant Su76, then i've said that a small pen nerf should be due. Still hitting mediums with ease but not heavier armored tanks with effectiveness. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Worst than brace : multiple OKW's flak trucks camping vp27 Mar 2017, 15:17 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2017, 15:40 PMle_saucisson_masque To the guy saying okw should smoke bofor to cap vp : tell me how u do that Off: not saying it's the way to go, but if you are in that scenario to fringe use it in this way (say you have the units nearby while the bofors is on brace): -Cancer nades (Fall, Ober) -Puma/Flak HT smoke canister In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Economy guide27 Mar 2017, 15:01 PM I guess we need such a guide hint hint strategist hint hint Someone fulfil as i'm working on memory (edit: nevermind i'm not gonna mention values to not make an error). Base: all factions starts with the same amount of fuel/muni gain and mp gain. But that's not necessarily the same for starting mp at the beginning of the game. MP income: all factions get 300mp/min which is later discounted by 1.5 per popcap. Strategic points: they steadily increase both muni and fuel. They give practically half the resources from specialised points. And it could go on... About gameplay, some IMO misconceptions/errors. 1-Spreading out your forces thin early on in order to cap the most amount of points. This is how most people start to play the early. Specially on teamgames, this can be punished easily by an opponent who rushes key points on the map (buildings, green cover) or tries to go for a 2v1 situation forcing early retreats. It's not just about capturing a point, but actually retaining it. 2-Floating MP, muni and fuel. MP: Unless it's the first 5mins, floating mp is not necessarily bad. Why? It all depends on how much control you have over your opponent. If you increase your popcap, this means that you have to be effectively be more efficient with your troops in order to not be losing on the mp war. Worst thing is having an army with idle units. Muni: unless you need it for specific high cost abilities, floating munition IS BAD IF you are not winning the engagements. Fuel: treat it as a tool or gate to gain access to generally more cost/effective units. 3-Caches early on. Yeah, every one wants to have them, but remind yourself you are losing almost a squad worth of mp in order to gain a few units of fuel/muni. It's an investment which can backfire if your opponents is able to aggro your position. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Worst than brace : multiple OKW's flak trucks camping vp26 Mar 2017, 00:37 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2017, 18:02 PMmiragefla Here's my solution to the flak cannon and HQ. -100-120 munitions for flak cannon no population -Panzer HQ cost halved but can only call in Obers and maybe jagdpIV -Upgrade required for the other tanks which brings back the cost to standard levels in total. -Gun can choose targets. Finally -AA no longer based on RNG +1 Cost (amount and type of, cause i'm not convinced with muni for tech) can be discussed but i would like to see a half tech for T4 which unlocks JPIV and Obers earlier and having some kind of TD in case of Flak HQ destruction. To OP and some users here: 1- Is OKW Flak HQ worst than brace. A big NOPE. 2- Is multiple Flak HQ OP? Not really. As mentioned by playercardplz (kappa), UKF has a nice offmap (in fact several offmaps) to deal with them (one of them recently nerf in order to not 1 shot it). 3- Are AFK emplacements flawed by design. BIG YES. 4- Is the OKW Flak HQ tech flawed. IMO YES. People are really hypocrite if they consider OKW static play good and fair while they heavily critic UKF emplacement STYLE. I'm not talking about level of cancer (UK is way worst) but their basics are the same (retreat to medic HQ, sit ISG and let them afk shoot at whatever they can, protect back flank with Flak HQ, specially behind hedges). SOLUTION: -Not necessarily exact what Mirage said, but at least the concept. -Bofor/Flak HQ toggle mode between AA and land targeting. -Bofor/Flak HQ has a manual arc where they can shoot. No automatic rotation. Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2017, 23:53 PMShadowLinkX37 OKW also doesn't have any meta useable AA for teamgames. Guess what, this applies to all factions. Centurion/Ostwind are not cheap, M5 requires a further munition investment and (currently) AA HT are not in "popular" tech choices nor the units itself are as good. In fact, it's easier (fuel/mp wise) to get a HT for AA, than trying to get either Ostwind/Centurion. About AA: if toggle mode with static emplacements can be implemented, i wouldn't mind increasing range and effectiveness on them (specially if the OKW Flak is locked behind upgrade). PD: "If we can finally buff flak bunker emplacement from OKW commanders, that would be great" PD2: "If we can finally swap flak bunkers on base from OKW for MG bunkers and remove extra MG bunkers from USF base, that would be great" In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: MARCH 28th UPDATE25 Mar 2017, 15:03 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2017, 13:33 PMvasa1719 But wait guys, so how ppl must use in brits command vehicle, if in exmaple i go bofors. Better was like write somobody make recon for ammo. Or make more useful command vehicle with his up. Something something - rework BS things from BRITS in next patch - something something. Buff/Debuffs/abilities: less of them or different. In order for it to work on something that is not an AEC, the speed penalty has to be removed. In: COH2 Gameplay