Profile of zarok47

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 587

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Zarok47
Steam: 76561198007472278


Thread: Why no one complains about Bunker spam?8 Feb 2018, 16:44 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2018, 16:37 PMMittens Bunker spam in 3v3 - 4v4 is actually a problem if we wanna look at large team format. The problem IMO with the OST/okw bunker is that they self spot while the fighting pit has to have a garrison to gain that same sightline. Bullshit, both upgrades add the same sight (check the stats). Could you check atleast one claim before posting? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infinite Health Maxims8 Feb 2018, 08:54 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2018, 08:50 AMPanzer Poacher That might be true in 1v1. Certainly not in 2v2 though. Which doesnt mean that I think that they're bad atm. Keeping maxims alive is even easier in 2vs2. In: Replays
Thread: instead of adding a fifth man to grenadier8 Feb 2018, 08:39 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2018, 02:15 AMFiresparks 5 men grenadier feels wrong. They are not suppose to have that much model. a subtle health preserve their visual uniqueness. We're balancing this game on feelings now? And we're disregarding every negative that comes with said health increase? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rebalancing Sniper Counter for Ostheer8 Feb 2018, 08:35 AM Making the sov sniper one model will not fix any of the issue's plagueing it (impossible to kill with infantry or 222). It will only make it possible to countersnipe it with ostheer (terrible design and sucks to be okw eh?) Snipers need a straight up nerf, they shouldn;t be a hardcounter to infantry as they are now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is it with Maxims these days?8 Feb 2018, 08:30 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2018, 06:28 AMdreamerdude they got nerfed to the ground a few patches ago They got buffed back into spam mode last patch. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infinite Health Maxims8 Feb 2018, 08:26 AM fast de-set-up and 6 man means losing a maxim happens only when the sov player wants it. In: Replays
Thread: instead of adding a fifth man to grenadier7 Feb 2018, 08:40 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2018, 06:04 AMdreamerdude or just stop clumping your units and learn how to engage better. Your rank 800 ostheer advice has been noted. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rebalancing Sniper Counter for Ostheer7 Feb 2018, 08:31 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2018, 19:24 PMNosliw I'm not sure why no one else has said the most obvious solution: make the soviet sniper a 1 man squad like the rest of the snipers. There's no reason that it should be 2 men; the argument that it's unique is weak, and it's more like a gimmick. If you simply make the sniper a clone of the WM sniper, then you don't have to worry about all this "give 222 a +15% accuracy modifier vs snipers" or anything. Plus, buffing 222 doesn't help against anything other than suiciding the 222 for snipers... MAYBE. Once the 222 hits the field in team games (I'm talking about 2v2), and especially when playing against 2x Soviets, the soviets will have a combination of, or all of, the following: conscripts with AT nades, mines planted, AT gun fielded, Penal with PTRS. I've seen instances of games where good soviet players have 2 snipers in early game, and already have AT nades / AT gun / PTRS in time for fast 222. I know this for sure. Just last game I played vs a really tip top abusing soviet team on Moscow outskirts. My teammate and I had BOTH fuels during the entire "early game" (first 5 minutes) until we both rushed for Flammenwerfer HTs. We both waited for the flame to finish, and rushed the double sniper at the exact same time. The snipers INSTANTLY retreated, and at the same time, 4 conscripts from both players Oorah'd and AT naded both our halftracks. My partners then died to an AT gun that was already waiting in the sniper's retreat path. So please people, do not talk about "222 is the counter" when soviets can get every single tool to counter 222 even with 0 fuel income (they simply need 15 fuel for AT nades and their starting fuel to build AT guns or Penals). So, let me stress again. The fix is not a 222 buff, it's a sniper nerf. Make it 1 man. Yep, same thing with the AEC hitting at the same time as the 222 too (hah). M20 and m3 have a small window, but fausts are everwhere. And then there is the kubel... Snipers (all of them) should be vunerable to infantry flanks and counters to support weapons, not this one man army that nullifies both. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rebalancing Sniper Counter for Ostheer6 Feb 2018, 18:12 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2018, 15:38 PMShadowLinkX37 What if....... NO NO NO, snipers are fu- snipers are balanced and availble to all fac- no no, snipers are needed because else you can't counter errrr others snipers. Yes, thats why you need them. And it's not like snipers ignore stuff like veterancy, unit retention, RNG, positioning, flanking and cover right? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rebalancing Sniper Counter for Ostheer6 Feb 2018, 09:38 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2018, 09:00 AMthedarkarmadillo The 222 uses a small AOE right? So accuracy would only help so much and then it might end up being OP (20 damage per shot iirc) so what about just having snipers take ~10% more damage from the 222 instead? See where that goes and increase/decrease as needed. The cannon does jack shit vs infantry, it's the pintle mg that does the work. Right now, the mg has a 0.75 accuray modifer vs snipers, ergo, it sucks. In: COH2 Balance