Profile of TheMachine

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 875 | Subs: 6

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/GeneralsGentlemen
Website: http://www.generalsgentlemen.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/generalsgentlemen
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ggthemachine
Youtube: www.generalsgentlemen.com
Timezone: Australia/Perth

Show Latest Posts


Thread: 17 pounder vs Pak439 Sep 2015, 15:02 PM 17 Pounder is a good unit but the 75 fuel and 20 popcap is way too much. It's in an awkward spot where it's hard to get mid game because of the 75 fuel, but then when the fuel isn't a problem in the late game the 20 popcap generally prevents it. Making it too cheap could make it a bit OP in team games but certainly a popcap reduction would be in order. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 10:43 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 10:29 AMAchtAchter 15 range is still more than enough to kite slow heavy tanks. You can kite Panthers with Jacksons, why would anyone have problems in a 45 vs 60 match up In theory yes, except for when the majority of maps are urban or just contain lots of shotblockers and choke points preventing Tank Destroyers from reliably making use of their 60 range. There is a reason why Airbourne is the only viable commander for USF in team games. You can't play without P47. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 09:45 AM King Tiger and Tiger Range buff is very questionable. Yes Heavies get countered by Tank Destroyers, that is literally the point of them. Super heavy anti everything tanks that can take a massive beating, wipe infantry and AT guns incredibly easily and dual medium tanks should be countered by Tank Destroyers which are incredibly fragile, slow and lack Anti infantry entirely. The only advantage is range, since penetration is not consistent enough for high DPS. With such little range advantage what is even the point of Tank Destroyers? SU-85's and Jacksons are really going to need a buff if that change goes through, (which it shouldn't) they are already difficult to use as it is and very map dependant. Tank Destroyers should be countered by Infantry Based AT (Shreks, Bazookas and AT Guns) definitely not anti everything heavies. In: Lobby
Thread: 25 pounder of the British army8 Sep 2015, 13:13 PM They're incredibly negligible. You can run through the smoke and it's rare you'll lose models or see it blow up a garrison. The throw range is too low, the scatter is too much and the gap inbetween shots is high. It definitely needs a small buff, but important not to overdo it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Chruchill AVRE tank OP 1 Sep 2015, 12:10 PM Likewise with the SturmTiger, something that strong shouldn't have so much health and armour. Pretty silly. It should also have a munitions cost attached to it like in Coh1. Make it cost say 15 munitions each shot. that would make it interesting. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW: Searchlight29 Aug 2015, 16:48 PM Yeah at least 10 fuel would be do it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Generals Gentlemen Shoutcasts!28 Aug 2015, 13:12 PM Game 1 of the Pacific Invitational Grand Final. In: COH2 Shoutcasts
Thread: what bonuses (exactly) do the ostheer command tank give ?27 Aug 2015, 10:47 AM Is it definitely 20%? I heard it was 25%. In: Lobby
Thread: Captain costs 50 manpower to reinforce?27 Aug 2015, 02:45 AM The Major costs 40 to reinforce as well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Molotovs and AT nades into single upgrade26 Aug 2015, 09:13 AM Having them together removes strategic depth and choice, which is not a good idea. What would certainly be better is Molotov getting a buff, because currently they are awful. Still worth getting though. In: COH2 Gameplay