joke unit in 3v3+.
Not just in 3v3. Its only 200 manpower...and it gives so much info for zero effort. It needs a fuel cost at least, but to be honest it feels like it should be a doctrinal unit.
Posts: 1157 | Subs: 2
joke unit in 3v3+.
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Posts: 622
Posts: 773
Van Voort made the interesting suggestion that this unit was now cheap enough to be destroyed and scavenged.
Does anybody do this?
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
That's quite something, OKW always seem to float a lot of MP when I watch matches and transferring 200? MP for 5 fuel every few minutes is quite something for a fuel starved faction. Either no one has thought of this or it isn't as good as it sounds else we would see it a lot more.
Posts: 254
In big games that drag on OKW almost always buys one with their usual MP float
Vast majority of team games I play, about 1% of those someone decides to use it. about 50% of those times though they don't use it properly.
Most people build one in any match above 1vs1.
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
I think you all are heavily suffering from confirmation bias. Unless Relic gives us a comprehensive statistic that tells us how often it is really being used, you should keep your assumptions to yourselves since they only serve as subjective means to make your opinions worth more without any foundation whatsoever.
Go ahead and give it a munitions cost for the scan - you now have a unit without any inherent use, which you could as well delete from the game. The unit is highly situational. It's not an "I win" button. Ofc, if you are just cosplaying as UKF when playing Soviets or USF you deserve to get punished for it.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
20fu would be a fair price increase IMO. Its pretty silly that you can buy a maphack for the price of a pioneer squad, and thus don't have to worry about the consequences on your tech.
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
It used to cost 20 fuel and nobody used it. Like it was changed to cost no fuel because most people never built it ever because 20 fuel is half the price of a new truck.
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
It used to cost 20 fuel and nobody used it. Like it was changed to cost no fuel because most people never built it ever because 20 fuel is half the price of a new truck.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 622
But with respect, that is now irrelevant.
Dealing with facts as they now are, the UHU is potentially open to abuse. Agreed?
Posts: 830
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
But with respect, that is now irrelevant.
Dealing with facts as they now are, the UHU is potentially open to abuse. Agreed?
It cost 25 fuel, and just because nobody uses a unit doesn't make it bad. Penals are very underused, but they are a fairly strong infantry squad when upgraded and vetted.
Stock Ostheer and Soviet tanks were barely used because callins were a thing, but that didn't make all of them terrible.
You can't justify buffs to a unit that is fairly priced on the basis that noone uses it. Thats not how balance works. You look at the strengths and uses of said unit, and then you figure out what would be a fair price. 200mp only for a mobile maphack IS NOT a fair price no matter how you try to rationalize it.
Posts: 875 | Subs: 6
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
How fundamentally has OKW changed to were 20 fuel only 3-4 months ago is more than it is now? The IR HT isn't abuse, especially considering OKW isn't exactly swimming in recon options and the large "sweep" time of the search light. Like 10 fuel would be reasonable, but 20? Nah.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
You seem to be deliberately missing my point
...................................
Posts: 106
44 | |||||
15 | |||||
11 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |