Profile of Tetley

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 187

General Information


Thread: Advanced Barton Warfare Strategy11 May 2014, 20:12 PM Awesome, great to see some of the top guys posting out guides! In: Guides
Thread: Elite Troops10 May 2014, 18:44 PM Only issue i find with this is that they will just go cap else where and that the gren blob can deal with your guards much faster than your sniper can deal with the grens allowing the scout car to move in In: Red Army Strategies
Thread: Gren spam to tiger10 May 2014, 18:30 PM Hows everyone fighting this right now? just had 3 2v2 games where we were winning all of them until the heavy stuff stuff rolls out and we have nothing to effectively deal with it. In: Red Army Strategies
Thread: Thoughts on the Stale 2v2 Meta (ISU v Ele)8 May 2014, 20:24 PM Jump back to quoted post8 May 2014, 19:50 PMraw i feel if the is-2 wasn't a waste of everyones time and resources a lot could be improved. obviously, non-bad paks would go a long way aswell. Well i agree its still another call in to fight a call in. Soviet stock units just don't really have any decent viable way to attack an elephant. Even if you do get close most the shots you actually get to fire bounce off. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Next patch ETA7 May 2014, 13:43 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2014, 13:39 PMNeo First of all, the elephant is not the most expensive tank destroyer in the game, the ISU is by 35 fuel and some manpower. Secondly, Soviets have no infantry-based AT so yes, of course you have to counter the Elephant with combined arms. Thirdly, I don't have a problem with people working together to destroy artillery. The problem I have is that the Elephant doctrine comes with everything you need to counter anything the Soviets could possibly throw at you. Fourthly, the ISU is just as OP as the Elephant if not more OP right now. Both need hotfixing ASAP. That and all artillery is currently a bit naff. Also that twitch video has a few extra commanders in the commander selections In: COH2 Balance
Thread: kreatiir's "The Underdog Tournament" 2vs2-tourney5 May 2014, 10:51 AM I like this idea. Also what about a team tournament with one pro and one underdog per team? In: News
Thread: Cruzz's fantasy patch thread4 May 2014, 16:17 PM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2014, 11:22 AMKyleAkira This game is becoming a "company of heavy tanks call in". I'd like to see that heavy call ins limited by 1-2 units at the same time per player. p.e: 1 Tiger / 1 Elephant / 1 IS-2 / 1 ISU-152 / 1 kv-2 2 Kv8 / Kv1 / That was working in Vcoh, atm it seems like any other tank that doesn't come from heavy call ins, are useless (except panther) +1 to company of call in. I'd also like to see a change to guards aim time so that they actually shoot their PTRS and changes to the commanders that are already out. It would be nice if many more of them could be used competitively and be a bit more unique. Also be great if it wasn't all the heavy call on commanders being the best ones. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Guards PTRS-41 AT Rifle4 May 2014, 16:13 PM Well this explains why the scout car i was fighting earlier hardly took any damage from my guards. Wondered why they weren't shooting much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-1524 May 2014, 14:42 PM For me the major issue is that as soviets without a commander with the ISU (or other heavy tank) soviet end game is still lacking. An as the Germans the elephant becomes the obvious choice commander to take this thing on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU85 derserves some AI ability4 May 2014, 12:49 PM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2014, 00:24 AMPuppetmaster If you were to buff the AI you would have to nerf the AT. It doesnt really need AI imo. What would be better is swapping T70 and SU-76 around, so that you get light at in T3 and some anti infantry / scout tank in T4. +1 though this has been mentioned so many times its not going to happen. In: Lobby