Profile of MarcoRossolini

Buddy, the only one indoctrinated here is you. I am just being realistic. And:

1. Assuming that someone won the war because it was better than his opponent it's just childish. You probably have like 18 years at most and you built your history knowllege on 2 penny sites like the one you quoted instead reading history books, studying technical features of allied and Axis tanks, or waching some serious documentary films on Discovery based on FACTS, statistics and historical documentation;
2. Every sensible and unbiased man in this world knows that Allied won the war because they had the superior manpower and resources, being able to flood any front with 10 times more men and equipment.
3. Everybody, including me, are happy that they did so and appreciate the sacrifice of so many Allied soldiers, because of that we are living in a free world (at least a good part of it). But even so, our eyes must stay open and our judgement must not be altered by stupid stereotypes issued from Clint Eastwoold's movies where one american officer would kill 50 germans soldiers with his thumb. Wehrmacht was a splendid army, excellent trained and equiped, best army of its time. UNFORTUNATELLY in THE MOST WRONG HANDS, but this does not mean we cannot admire its tactics and equipment and recognize its superiority. Even the uniforms were looking verry good (how could they look bad, while designed by one of the most famous italian cloths designer which is famous even today?!)

To @Burts: I reccomend to you the Discovery documentary movie

Honestly, I cannot trust Discovery one bit these days.

I'd encourage that you'd have a look at some of the Soviet tactics that had been developed by the end of the war... Especially with regard to Deep Battle and operations such as Bagration. Even Kursk, which given some of the posts on this forum seems to be regarded as a German victory, should be considered with what happens after Hitler cancels Citadel (i.e. the Red Army destroys the salients north and South of the Kursk salient, that's hardly a stalemate when the opposition counterattacks you in days and pushes you back.

Being outnumbered 10 times is certainly an exaggeration by the way. At Barbarossa, the Red Army was in fact outnumbered during the invasion. Most of the time, the Red Army had a 2 to 1 advantage. Even during Stalingrad 62nd Army is outnumbered by the 6th Army.

Your glowing praise of their uniforms and you suggestion that we have to "recognise its superiority" makes me concerned for your objectivity.

The fact is, the Wehrmacht was at its peak in 1941. By 1945, its gone.

You can't attribute its defeat entirely to one man.

I wouldn't dismiss the World of Tanks forums either, there are some very reputable historians posting there, or people who are extremely well read on them.

I look forward to more praise of the Tiger and its operational effectiveness...

I'd recommend doing some 2v2 as Soviets. You'll learn a lot about their weaknesses that way...

^^ that's definitely not what you want...

Finally!

This has been a major problem since CoH2's release.

So 80% of people agree the Soviets need significant changes of some kind... I hope Relic's watching...