Profile of Porygon

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2779

General Information
Steam: 76561198067678314
Game Name: Porygon


Thread: You know you play too much COH2 When..10 Apr 2014, 05:22 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2014, 05:13 AMrejfor I want to see more movies about Eastern Front after COH2. The Stalingrad (1993?) one is quite good, Stalingrad was really a true hell of both forces, those soldiers weren't even trained fighting in ruins. Hitler was really a big noob trying to get this big concrete landfill (thanks to Luftwaffe) and wasting the whole sixth army there. He was a genius in "politics", but crap in war. In: Lobby
Thread: New Soviet Commander on the way!!!10 Apr 2014, 01:41 AM waah, sound like a wehr defence LHS + blitz RHS + PE SE LHS mixed but how would manpower blitz work? if it is like the old wehr one costing only muni, it would be quite crazy because Soviet almost float tons of muni the whole game, and there is no super muni hungry stuff like guards/marked vehicle, etc. 2v2 will become a windustry + NOSB spamfest In: Lobby
Thread: Make conscripts and grenadiers more equal10 Apr 2014, 00:19 AM There is no way a cons can be easily beaten by pio after the hot fix patch, and pio is actually 200 mp. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: You know you play too much COH2 When..9 Apr 2014, 01:16 AM I miss that joke thread back in GR in vCOH era, so many laughter back there. Katsusha, Katsusha everywhere In: Lobby
Thread: Call-in vehicles8 Apr 2014, 17:26 PM There is nothing wrong with T-34/76 and SU85, only the tech cost is stupid. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Call-in vehicles8 Apr 2014, 16:46 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Apr 2014, 16:38 PMKatitof No, the (soviet because this is what this thread is about) default units are not worth it AT ALL. 255 fuel for SU-85 and 370 for 2? Or similar costs for even more inferior tanks? No, thanks, I'd rather have 3 T34/85 ot IS-2+KV-8. Of course it is, you need to compare the tech cost reaching P4 as well, the only viable defence against T-34/85 call in is single P4, a Pak, or screck PG, but you can never have two P4 exist at the same time period of dual 85 call in. That's why it is so retarded that they increase teching cost without tweaking call in CP and cost. The current meta of soviet must use call-in armor saving the stupid teching cost or you just throw the game away, unless you outplay the Ostheer too much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Elite Troops8 Apr 2014, 06:01 AM No, it is because the stupid design of Ivan super assault gun and blitz in vet 1 only, vetting a P4 against Ivan T4 is almost a must, or you can't even use a damn panzer in Langres. If blitz is vet 0 ability, who would vet a panzer 4? And they say they will buff IS2 and ISU anti tank performance in next patch? What should Ostheer use lol? TA every game? Double vetting a single P4 harder worth it's cost. It would be great if they make blitz becoming global upgrade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch added so much tactical depth... really? Not ironic7 Apr 2014, 15:22 PM The capping and resource system wouldn't change back to vCOH style IMO, but I think the popcap should varies to the number of strat point the player hold, making it less possible that one player dominating map control but got owned by a super call in armour, that's totally bullshit, I would say. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Top-players and what makes the new metas7 Apr 2014, 08:33 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2014, 18:12 PMcataclaw I feel like im being pointed at here, HAHA. Im a competitive player by nature unless i screw around. When i am playing seriously i play with a strategy that i know that is solid and works in pretty much every situation, with no hard-counters against it hence i started going 5 grens because i wanted a very mobile force, and simply because the MG42's in top ranked play might block off an area for some time, but it can also sit there, be stationary and be of barely any use at all, a waste of manpower. And if it does get in the Soviets hands it can fuck my game over so i decide to barely, very very rarely ever build one when Grenadiers can do the same job, but also bleed manpower instead of just forcing a retreat. Meta-games are ever changing. Remember when 2x MG42's were the standard? Grenadiers are so popular because they are sooo god damn worth the manpower cost. And lets be fair, most people tune in to streams in this community just to chat & interact with the streamer. 80% of my viewers atleast doesnt give a flying fuck about the game usually. The game is being worked on and i wouldn't jump the ship as of yet calling the game "dead" most people are just on a break due to the horrible balance in the game. You are keeping the promise of fucking the elefant on the webcam, right? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rifle Grenades7 Apr 2014, 07:06 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2014, 07:01 AMCruzz I'm sorry I don't like the glorious tactical side of the game of fighting against hordes of ubermensch grenadiers with 5 different gimmicky soviet units and still losing because the A-move is strong. Have fun, I know I wasn't having it this patch. I was saying Brit A-move victory before it was cool In: COH2 Balance