Profile of The Spycrab

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 39

General Information


Thread: radio intercept is annoying5 Dec 2019, 11:25 AM A quirky and new mechanic was added to CoH2 where you could choose commanders without radio intercept, its called “pick another doctrine” In: Lobby
Thread: The UKF solution4 Dec 2019, 13:14 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2019, 13:11 PMSeductiveCardbordBox Maybe if we actually fixed the UKF pitiful roster and reliance on static emplacements, we could make them fun to play as and against. Nothing less fun than a painfully handicapped army. Any suggestions as from experience their unit roster feels at times underwhelming? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The UKF solution4 Dec 2019, 13:08 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2019, 12:58 PMDonnieChan they are playable. all their strenghts are still in gamem Enlighten me please In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The UKF solution4 Dec 2019, 12:53 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2019, 12:39 PMDonnieChan if you buff brits in any way the game will be broken and unfun again So 1 faction should suffer entirely because it will make the game “unfun” i can name at least a dozen ways the game is not fun from every faction, there is always going to be stuff that makes the game unfun. If axis factions suffered as bad as the brits are right now I’d be saying the exact same thing. They need to be at least playable because its unfun that you cant play an entire faction which costs extra money on top of the game itself. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stationary PANTHER - Poll26 Nov 2019, 14:18 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Nov 2019, 15:06 PMVipper That is simply biased observation, the stats tell a different story. Actually FF is one of the most accurate unit in game with a mid range of 45 higher than both elephant and JT. The reason for this thread is a subjective, biased opinion piece no? It is based on the fact a panther while stationary missed, just because a 1 off observation happened doesn't mean its actually true, i was trying to get a satirical kind of attitude across in that post. I know how good the FF actually is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stationary PANTHER - Poll25 Nov 2019, 14:28 PM If the panther is getting an accuracy increase, when is the firefly? From experience the firefly misses a whole lot more than panther be it stationary or moving. Something that does not need fixing doesn't need a buff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About IS20 Nov 2019, 09:36 AM This is all in my opinion and from experience so take it with a pinch of salt. IS perform worse pre-nerf even with minor buffs to try and fix this. The best I can suggest is to revert the changes and push the upgrade behind the platoon or company command post, varying on where it is placed giving them a relative buff to allow them to at least compete with grens/volks/sturmpios, not kill them straight up but at least provide some bleed that is lasting. Personally I'm also fine with the cover mechanic but I don't believe it should work as it currently does. I propose for the cover mechanic to make it a defensive focused trait with an invisible setup time so rocket artillery like the katyusha in team games and land mattress in 1v1s if that ever happens don't provide their cover bonus unless they want to be made vulnerable while attacking to indirect such as mortars and axis rocket artillery. If you have any questions or better versions feel free to send it, but don't start insulting each other again. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF Emplacements12 Nov 2019, 14:14 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2019, 17:28 PMVipper Actual hitbox and graphic on screen are 2 different things. I am talking mostly about hitbox because a graphical change wouldn't do much but i am not familiar with the code used to make CoH2 so its best i don't talk to much about it. In: Lobby
Thread: UKF Emplacements11 Nov 2019, 17:10 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2019, 15:29 PMLago Turn the Pak 43 and 17 pounder into 90 range static ATGs that are easily decrewed. Remove their ability to fire through shotblockers. Turn the Bofors into a much cheaper, brace-less emplacement that a lone mortar can clear out given time (like the OKW Flak). Turn the Mortar Pit into a 180 MP unit that has no Brace, the durability of an Ostheer bunker, and requires a garrisoned squad to autofire. 1. 17pdr Pak 43 i can get behind, and is fairly balanced however the 17pdr would need a size reduction of some sort because its a tad large compared to the Pak 43 from memory 2. Eeeeeeh, Bofos is still larger than flak emplacement and that thing has some iffy damage hit taking because of the sandbags that make it mortar immune at times so bofos is fine where it is maybe at a decreased price if anything 3. I'd be fine with that if all other mortars didn't auto fire, which is why i like the mortar trench slit idea better, more suiting for CoH2 imo In: Lobby
Thread: UKF Emplacements11 Nov 2019, 15:01 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2019, 14:50 PMullumulu Seems like you lack a tone of information from other factions. 1. you calc the tech cost to a motor emplcament? than lets calc all thtech cost to get your first ober out...it should be around 140 fuel and a tone of manpower. 2.worse at option than ost? what are u playing? UKF has handheld AT WITH AT nades combined on cheap squad; has UKF sniper with critical shot; has AEC with critical shot, has superior AT 6 pdr, has FF with high alpha dmg and stun and 60 range with turret, has really good mediums and KT HP like tanks, and little pershings, 3. UC is one of the best early LV ingame..use it 4.MG42 and vickers are on par---vickers is better in cover/ houses and make alot more dmg and MG42 supress faster..which end in less dmg since supressed unit get less dmg 1. 450MP is 2 squads of inf secs but is also immobile so it’s a straight downgrade from all other mortars 2. Panzershreks ignore all medium armor if allies while PIAT can bounce off OST p4 but sure have the PIAT is clearly better, find me a player who doesn’t have P4 or a pack out by the time you get an AEC out, 6pdr and pak40 are basically the same except for the sabot round increasing penetration it lacks against tigers, firefly is slow and immobile and has the longest reload of a TD and is out classed by even the SU-85 which can self spot, you clearly never used a Cromwell because they lose in a 1v1 3. Very situational unit 4. You got a CQC to combo with the MG42 suppression Back on topic mortars are lacking in general for their job at such a hugh cost due to being unable to move and its counters In: Lobby