Profile of PanzerGeneralForever

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2016, 04:22 AMFiresparks

the lack of a snare or accurate atw make the 6 pdr a bit risky to use. british infantry probably have the worst anti-tank weapon in the game.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2016, 02:53 AMFiresparks

the point is to gave the british a reliable tank destroyer that's not prohibitively expensive or risky to use.

With the churchill and comet being both expensive generalist tank, the Firefly should be a cheaper anti-tank support.

Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2016, 20:22 PMdreamerdude

Reasons why i think the landmattress is fine
1: at the moment is because it fires really slowly so it's easy to get out of it's area of effect before having heavy losses. EI: 1 rocket at a time at a slow rate of fire.

2: it's reload speed is fairly low

3: it really isn't all that mobile

4: and the cost is just right.

It may come out really early but when you see an early land mattress you know tanks are going to be delayed by a considerable amount.

Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2016, 10:31 AMvarunax

The Pershing is the only heavy tank in the game that can't shock crews with it's main gun lol; an obvious feature that was overlooked. Also, why is it "outstanding"? Because at vet3 it's good? You can say that about any heavy tank that hits vet3. The first 2 vets for a Pershing does jack shit. Vet 1 increases it's acceleration speed which translates to nothing in a tank fight. Vet 2 increases turret rotation speed and grenade throws which again, translate into nothing for tank fights. About every single heavy tank in this game gets vet bonuses that increases accuracy, range, HP, armor, or reload speed. The Pershing gets acceleration and grenades whoopiedoo.

If people wanted fast tanks that could flank, they would get the M10's. The Pershing's role as a heavy is supposed to head on other heavies, but does that mediocrely.