Profile of PanzerGeneralForever

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1072

General Information
Steam: 76561198060148756
Game Name: PanzerGeneralForever


Thread: Proposed changes for Soviets 4/2723 Apr 2016, 16:55 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2016, 16:49 PMMissCommissar That should be a really good luck for your ISU-enemy and bad luck for you, that you insta-lose your full-HP squad from ISU's long range boom. You know, ISU is pretty inaccurate AI gun. AT accuracy is way better, but AI is very random. Reminds Sherman's HE shells. May hit nothing or insta wipe your obers. Buddy, we're talking about the KV2 here. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Proposed changes for Soviets 4/2723 Apr 2016, 16:47 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2016, 15:39 PMC0ffeebeanz You propose 85 range which means you could cover half the 1vs1 maps in rotation with that thing. -You mean like the Jagdtiger, PaK 43 and Elefant which can shut down a KV-2 without even trying?... I don't see the pak43, jagdtiger, or elephant wiping full health squads from across the map either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Update on the 27th preview23 Apr 2016, 00:51 AM Does rear armor also account for half the side armor? That means they don't necessarily have to go all in as you say... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April 27th Balance Preview Mod Release Notes22 Apr 2016, 16:31 PM Soooo 2 problems I have with the recommended changes. -Removing panzer shrecks: RIP OKW AT. Racketen where it's at is not viable AT gun imo. Against massed tanks, OKW will hugely struggle. Expensive mediums, squishy main line AT, and no non-fuel mobile AT aside from snares. I feel the hurt coming on. - Major Arty over buffed- decreased cost, double the shells, decreased time between shots are all huge buffs. Only nerf i saw was the range to call it in... I know it was garbage before but now.... Non-doc artillery piece eraser says hello. I just feel it's a bit much Overall I love the changes suggested. So many have been suggested but ignored my relic and now something will hopefully be done about it. Brummbarrs will rise from the ashes.... The 3 problems I had with it was that it was in t4 (now cheaper), too expensive, ( now cheaper), and a pathing nightnare (crush from medium to heavy). All the things I disliked about it are gone. Looming forward to this.... I think a slight accuracy buff to ostwinds wouldn't have been bad tho. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Switching brummbar and ostwind tech building swap21 Apr 2016, 04:09 AM Decrease brummbarrs cost, increase its crush and it's fine. Ostwinds need to be more accurate. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reduce Braces Effect/ Mortar Pits less accurate20 Apr 2016, 18:55 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2016, 17:19 PMRocket Target weak point is a HUGE perk above the 6er, almost guaranteed death for most allied tanks especially when it can be combined with all the other axis tanks that have that or another form of stun lock. I think each ATG isbest suited to its faction. Since brit infantry don't have snares they need faster ATG to deal with flanking vehicles whereas ostheer have slower tanks so it's harder to chase retreating tanks hence the stun lock. Pak is more defensive and Brit is more offensive. I use both abilities a lot but at the end of the day I prefer the SURVIVABILITY of the 6pdr due to rapid maneuvers In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I really enjoy playing brits18 Apr 2016, 23:22 PM I also love using the Brits offensively with sniper and Cromwell combo. I rarely build emplacements as Brits. In: Lobby
Thread: 30muni mine balance18 Apr 2016, 16:08 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 15:51 PMspectre645 wehr is primarily a defensive faction until they reach t3 for their tanks. attacking wehr is pretty punishing if the push doesn't go that well for most allied factions. As soviets, mines act as a defense mechanism that help slow down the wehr defensive creep on your cutoff or fuel if a push does not go as well as hoped and you have a mass retreat on your hands. pios have great sight range and come with a minesweeper upgrade. why wouldn't you sweep enemy territory. it's just common sense. The choice is really simple. you either eat a mine with manpower or you eat it with a one-off munition investment. Thing is, unlike USFs and OKW, ostheer needs his pios for so many more things than those factions. Building the tier structures, repairing vehicles, laying down wire and mines, building caches etc. Guess what, UKF, USFs, and OKW don't need engineers in order to do more than half those things. Also, pios are among the weakest of its type. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 30muni mine balance18 Apr 2016, 16:04 PM 30 munis mines should wipe full health squads. They should be able to wipe full model damaged squads. I agree with OP. It should hugely dmg squads go the point they have to retreat or get wiped but not outright wipe them. About minesweepers. They are always necessary against ppl who use mines. However, they can't be on every squad at once. Mines are usually on the enemy side of the map meaning you need to have your fragile engineer squad at the front lines with your infantry and not doing the loads of other things you need them for. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reduce Braces Effect/ Mortar Pits less accurate17 Apr 2016, 16:10 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2016, 15:59 PMAustralian Magic What the hell? AEC is best light vehicle in game? Lel. Cromwell is not best medium tank. It's most cost efficient. What's wrong with engis? How they are offensive unit with they don't have any ability to close the distance? I agree that AEC isn't the best light tank after the patch. T70 is. However Cromwell IS the best tank in the game because it's the most cost efficient. When determining the best unit type in the game, cost is always a key factor. What do you think best medium tank is? REs are the best engineer types imo. No that great used offensively unless they can flankbajd get close without being targeted and find some green cover. In: COH2 Balance