Profile of TexasRanger

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 43

General Information


Thread: Rage Faces and Memes in Coh2 chat26 Mar 2013, 18:09 PM For wanting them added or for praising the relative value of the thread? I'd much rather talk about this than about "THQ shop refund", "1 line of speech added into game", or "looking for beta key". Beyond that, I'm all for optional features that can be used/ignored/turned off at will. Rude. In: Lobby
Thread: Rage Faces and Memes in Coh2 chat25 Mar 2013, 13:43 PM First thread in a while that actually posts about something relevant! More options are almost always welcome, so yeah I'd say add them in. Liberal use of the ignore function will always be your friend for "those people". In: Lobby
Thread: Competitive Play11 Mar 2013, 23:47 PM Inb4 "mirror matches!" New features that would add to high level play would, for me, be things that place higher demand on player reactions in terms of speed and accuracy, and I didn't see too much like that. Maybe pulling off big flanks with the vaulting mechanic could be interesting, or juking enemies with the true sight. On the E-sport side of things, so far the news has been quite disappointing. In: Lobby
Thread: Left 4 Dead 210 Mar 2013, 21:35 PM Well Zooey >>>>>> Rochelle In: Other Games
Thread: Left 4 Dead 210 Mar 2013, 16:35 PM Yeah I'll play with you, add texasranger327 In: Other Games
Thread: COH2 release date set for June 25th, 20137 Mar 2013, 14:19 PM I really hope they can manage a spectator function with that extra time! In: News
Thread: Letter from Greg Wilson27 Feb 2013, 20:34 PM It's great to finally hear from them! Too bad he didn't actually say anything. In: Lobby
Thread: Snipers in CoH225 Feb 2013, 19:02 PM Well, THAT won't stop me from buying the game, but I do agree with 12ocky that it's very poor to balance a unit by simply making it harder to control. That's like them deciding tanks are too strong, and so they remove the reverse-move hotkey. In: Lobby
Thread: Mirror Match19 Feb 2013, 19:13 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2013, 17:53 PMNaeras Even if the game is balanced, there will still be problems with this. What if you end up playing on a map where a certain player is really good with one faction and completely crap with the other one? That's the point, it forces people to learn both. In earlier rounds of a tournament you can coin toss the faction for a BO1 because honestly at this early stage it shouldn't matter which faction the better player has, he should win fairly easily. In the later rounds where games are closer, that's when you go to BO3 or 5 and use something like the VP rule to determine final rounds. I genuinely don't understand the hate over this rule, as it's yet another thing for players to think about and figure out how to incorporate into their game. This assumes that factions are fairly well-balanced, but with just the one matchup for now that shouldn't be too hard, and anyone claiming otherwise better not be advocating mirrors anyway. In: Lobby
Thread: Mirror Match16 Feb 2013, 04:07 AM As opposed to mixed games where you are forbidden to learn from your opponent...? In: Lobby