Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: Simple Fixes: Tank Meta Issues22 Dec 2019, 09:24 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2019, 13:40 PMAerohank Yes, it is fair, since you are given the tools for it. How is this any different from lets say, early game USF vs OST infantry play? Why does USF have to flank OST HMGs and use smoke or light vehicles to counter them? Why can't they just win in a straight up fight? Why should OST be able to make a heavy tank and just be able to A move and win, when the faction has Panzerschreks, high DPS AT guns, cheap Stugs, and P4s and Panthers with blitz? Still if you can't be bothered to use these tools, you can always sit back with your own 70 range heavy tank destroyer and let the Allied player do all the hard flanking stuff. This not true anymore. In my 2v2, it is much easier for allies infantry to flank/wipe mg and team weapons Then it is for panther to flank/kill 60td. That's why so many calls to tone down the oppressive 60td meta In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Incendiary barrage for panzerwer 22 Dec 2019, 09:20 AM Imo pwafer performance is fine but it is bit expensive compared to scotts and katty. Either make it cheaper or have smaller scatter without having to get real close. Pwafer is too late to deal with usf arty or sov 6 man weapon teams. Because as wehr, it is very hard now, to counter allies static plays. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Simple Fixes: Tank Meta Issues22 Dec 2019, 09:10 AM Imo the heavy call in meta problem is overblown. It benefits allies more but axis needed it more. Just because we see GO and tigers in wc19, creates a half full impression. Allies just need to have a 60td in their build and tigers cannot roam freely. While Is2 is a real bonus for allies. The unit is very hard to kill in my 2v2, let alone 1v1. Axis pretty much replaced the p4 with tiger. Something that hits stronger allies infantry and can stay around longer against 60td. Its rof vet is much needed. The recent buff to allies infantry did not help things. Basically the 60td have zone out axis late stock tanks. It is more efficiency to stall for tiger. GO tiger has arty too, much helpful. Imo it is back to 60td in how efficient they stop axis late games in their tracks. I also wondered if the heavy call in did not changed for wc19, what would be the faction win rates? Imo tiger contributed a lot for axis even so they have lower wins. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Simple Fixes: Tank Meta Issues21 Dec 2019, 17:17 PM I like heavy call in to remain as powerful as now. Their shock factor separates them from stock units. Imo the role of heavy call in acts as hero units. I am surprised to hear 4v4 is reason for this timing. I thought 4v4/3v3 was always easier to call in heavy. But i agree they come too early, easier to stall for them. So how we delay them? Simply make all tech structures need to get build. Like KT. Having all tech structures built show the hero qualities that you have the resources to call them. This is enough delay. However all tech structures timing may differ between factions. We just need to compensate with additional cp to bring them in line. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Incendiary barrage for panzerwer 21 Dec 2019, 17:12 PM The katty is better at dealing with axis static play, than pwafer is against allies mobile infantry. Somehow katty barrage is more deadly to okw structure now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Riflemen snares15 Dec 2019, 05:13 AM The problem is snares favour 60Td/Jackson and fast ATg. You cant just buff Rifles snare and forget the butterfly effect their unit composition can give. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen snares15 Dec 2019, 05:07 AM Idk mates! Rifles are backbone of USf and the strongest mainline infantry. Making snares for them after Major may be OP, giving Axis close range tanks even lesser room. Let alone thinking of buffing their snares! If any buffs to snares, imo faust need to make the line of sight better first. This may work if snares are moved to RE instead of rifles. As Usf mostly can skip RE build after early game. You can say the same about Volks, but they are inferior to Rifles as a game progress and Okw needs extra Sturm for repairs. Besides dropping a model before faust goes off, and you go through reloading delay again! A blob of Rifles with cheaper buffed snares charging at your tanks, like isnt Allies strong enough? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: wehrmacht buff opinions13 Dec 2019, 14:35 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2019, 13:34 PMT.R. Stormjäger That’s more of a map issue in corridor 2v2 maps. 60 range is needed when you deal with more lethal and heavier armoured tanks. You need to outrange them. I understand the complain and agree with it, but imo it’s more of a symptom of tanks reversing at the same speed as they go forward. Not really. I agree 60 range is needed in this case. BUT when you add 60 range with advantages in acccuracy, pen, sight, moving accuracy, damages and even 640hp, at cheaper costs. I dont think its necessary. It becomes oppressive. I agree reversing same speed for 60Td, is part of their oppressiveness. Makes your 60ATg have trouble taking a hit. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: wehrmacht buff opinions13 Dec 2019, 14:32 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2019, 12:47 PMBananenheld In my opinion and on my own observations: Mgs (Doenst matter which faction) gets weaker the longer the game goes. Increased yellow cover / RA vet buffs for opponents / increased indirect fire is the source of that, imp. Axis mg gets most affected because of their slowness. Late game the suppression and arc gets less useful. Yet Axis mg are more needed to hold allies blob. Go figure... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: wehrmacht buff opinions13 Dec 2019, 03:12 AM Further more i believe katy can be rushed out earlier. Im ok with pwafer current performance, but it comes too late as wehr also lacks arty to clear allies weapon teams. Very bad in 2v2 especially against usf. Pwafer is no where superior than katy to deserve it higher cost. Brumbar range nerf is unjustified. Period. And people wonder why top games go straight to tiger. Because it does AI + AT cheaper than t4 and more durable than t3 against op 60td In: COH2 Gameplay