Profile of PaRaNo1a

Jump back to quoted post9 Jan 2014, 20:49 PMJames Hale

Yes, but you have to consider balance.

If you make it so that light tanks have the worst scatter and accuracy handicaps in the game then you completely remove the main reason to buy them. In my mind, the idea of going for a fast T-70 over saving for a T-34 would be so I can chase down infantry and light vehicles, or flank weapon teams; if the crew can't aim for shit whilst moving then the role of the light tank is basically rendered moot. It already has a fairly narrow window of opportunity.

Conversely, heavy tanks moving and firing with good accuracy means that they are even more difficult to take down, and (presumably) the Panther would be loathed even more by Soviet players. (I know it's not actually classed as a heavy tank, but...)

Also: bigger tanks = more AoE per shot.

So, whilst your comment may have some historical basis, in balance terms I think that it ought to be the other way round, or I really don't see the point of going for a T-70 - a tank that can be disabled by a 'faust hit, one-shotted by a Teller mine or flanked by an upgraded Scout Car. Surely you want something that is fast and accurate, but still extremely vulnerable to anything that can penetrate it?

Jump back to quoted post9 Jan 2014, 19:14 PMlink0

We do accept the RNG in this game, because that's a set in stone game design choice by the developers.

Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2014, 20:43 PMLazyPapa

I prefer Smite over dota. IMHO the 3d person view is much better

Jump back to quoted post31 Dec 2013, 21:23 PMRooster Illusion

Thanks guys -- I'll probably end up trying out some 1v1s in the near future. Could be Ostwinds and P4s in the future for me.

Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2014, 19:44 PMBeltFedWombat

Blah blah blah. You know the 1 v 1 crowd are in a minority, don't you. I play 1 v 1 too, nut the disdain shown for people who enjoy bigger games (i.e. most of us) is hilarious.