Profile of Sgt.BigHead

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 65

General Information


Thread: 60 range TD6 Apr 2020, 11:05 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2020, 10:16 AMKatitof Historically, you wouldn't even have actual tanks, you'd have to cope with StuGs alone on the front, while all other working tanks are firmly sitting on defensive line. Historically, allies wouldn't even need TDs, because planes would take out all relevant armor formations. Historically of original game design, axis infantry should not have a chance in early game to keep that late game tanks strong. The game is not historical, the game is balanced. And yet, changes to ost need to be made extremely precisely, because it would overpower them beyond belief in team games according to balance team... You have elephants and SCAS, learn to use them. >Funny. The game is far more away to be balanced And stop saying its the learn to play issue. Its really just trying to win an argument with unbacked thesis. Yes historicaly German army had best designed tanks in the world with mostly low qualty metarials because of the resource war, and as I said before Allies can use air power and snares to make that tanks absolete... Germany lost he war because of lack off resources and over extension. Stugs used because of lack of resources and time to make heavy tanks for impracticaly roll over all the time. Game design "had" Good late game axis tanks and swarming soviet mediums with tds that was relatively balanced.Yeah I remember scout car sniper tactics etc. Had balance problems in the first place too. Axis inf stil not a chance against allied infantry. theoretically game balance maaaybe good but practicaly lots of abuse happening. And l2p issue is about using this abusive stuff for all sides. I said historical to just to make a vision about facts , Not for justfy any faction ...I am playing with all factions by the way. Dont use this "you are an axis fan boy" Attitute here. and also dont derail the subject with this kind of arguments. 60 range TD's is really rewarding for allies with current useless Tiger,KT tactics... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 60 range TD6 Apr 2020, 10:02 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2020, 18:37 PMmrgame2 Yes. Change your gameplay tactics. Get good my friend. Any nerf to 60 TD will allow Axis late game tanks to run riot. Axis tank should run riot at the late game,This was game design in the first place and also historicaly accurate. Allies should use snares,traps and airpower to cripple Axis armor not counter with High dps 60 range TD's. In 1vs1 everything's relatively balanced but in the team games Allies are more rewarding at all stages in the game and Axis esp Ostheer is RNG nighrmare... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger main gun nerf too much? (Winter patch)24 Mar 2020, 16:20 PM SO with no proper aoe no need to wait for tiger anymore getting back for panther with better roam. Axis's wiping potential hammered again... Dude this is tiger tank are u kidding me. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: wishlist Last few minor changes before live patch14 Mar 2020, 14:47 PM I wish that making ace tiger texture black instead of weird Golden desert camo thing... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About Heavy Tanks10 Mar 2020, 12:08 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Mar 2020, 11:52 AMLago Tank destroyers will rip through heavy generalists armour or not: that's what tank destroyers are for. but this is COH , Yes TD's job is that but There gonna lots of abusive stuff going to happen But Yeah Cheaper and more than one Heavy can be good with stabilized stats... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About Heavy Tanks10 Mar 2020, 11:39 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Mar 2020, 11:00 AMLago Honestly, I'd do something like cut the Tiger's armour down to 280, its health down to 960, give its main gun anti-infantry performance like the Comet, and cut it to 200 FU. Maybe even raise the cap from one on the field to two. The Panther and the Comet are the model heavies in my opinion. I dont encounter too much with comet in team games only rare, mostly IS/bren and firefly so I really dont now latest situation with comet and only faction didnt play with because did'nt bought ..If I understand what your try to say correctly, Nerfing the Cannon and buffing mgs is againts AI can be really proper way to balance the heavies I think, but lowering armor is not the good idea. Allied Ranged high dmg and penetration TD's will give hard time to tiger. If we bufff the speed MAaaaybe I can accept that is proper..ish I dunno In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About Heavy Tanks10 Mar 2020, 10:48 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Mar 2020, 10:46 AMLago I think, if the AoE nerfs work out, they'll be fine. The best designed heavy in the game right now is the Comet. Trying to make these in game-defining hero units is how they went wrong: they work best as slow, tough, 200ish FU tanks that are balanced well against medium armour. Yes In my opinion we can try something like what I proposed earlier but u are not wrong.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About Heavy Tanks10 Mar 2020, 10:41 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Mar 2020, 10:31 AMLago Heavy tanks are already too powerful against medium armour for their cost. If we made them as you suggest, they'd need a hefty price increase too. Yes you are right about that, we can componsate that with high resources requirement or high cp. maybe its makes them some kind of "hero" units with less right click with more utilies and more baby sitting. Giving rear armor penalty with dmg engine and stuff also makes dangerous for losing tank to enemy hands (with decrew content) I dont know just brain storming. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.310 Mar 2020, 10:35 AM Those are quite nice changes. What about giving some kind of combined arms buff at T4 (buff effects proximity with support weapons and inf) for ost againts incoming indirect fire attacks (Againts ; pack howies,mortars,arty etc.) for more defending capability instead of capping buffs or reinforce buffs. Giving slightly more durability fits for the ostheer faction at late game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About Heavy Tanks10 Mar 2020, 10:15 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2020, 22:05 PMHannibal Don't mind too much about some users that have replied to this thread, many are just trolling. I don't know which size of games you talk about. Balance mostly refers to 1v1 and 2v2. Larger modes are hard to balance since they mostly rely on the skill of your random mates and just blobbing at the right time. Many of the cores game mechanics don't work properly (flanking becomes more and more irrelevant since the unit density increases extremely) and arty fares way better the larger the mode is. Balancing according to team games is therefore hard to do, you either screw small or large game modes. Small modes however are less prone to RNG and fit the games overall design better, so that's why balance team usually only uses 1v1 and 2v2 as a reference. There are very few tweaks that you can do to adjust team games without altering the balance in small modes too much (mostly pop cost adjustments), but I doubt that this would "fix" the Tiger. Yes I figured that out at the end and just ignored them but thank you for sharing your opinion. In regards of balance I always thought about same way, using benchmark for 1v1 and 2v2 and now I see it happens that way. Flanking and the other systems actually that details that makes coh is coh but its shame that they re irrelevant at the current position of the game like u said. The problem I mentioned not just for tiger actually , it s for all heavies but thats right about 3v3 4v4 . If different balance system used for all game modes individually it will give balance team lotta work but maybe solve things at the end. In: COH2 Balance