Profile of Farlion

I think those statistics are a bit flawed because they include all matches, rather than the top-200 only. Why do I say that? Because there is no question that Axis are far easier to play at a lower skill level.

If you include all games, the win ratios for 2v2 look like this:
UKF: 41.5 %
Soviet: 46.0 %
USF: 45.3 %
Wehrmacht: 55.3 %
OKW: 55.2 %

Once you look at the Top 200 win rates, things change because people have an understanding of how the game works.

UKF: 48.2 %
Soviets: 53.4 %
USF: 47.4 %
Wehrmacht: 50 %
OKW: 49.4 %

That's a drastic shift in percentages. Why? Because people have an understanding of how the game works. Take the MG42. At the lower levels, most people would argue its the most oppressive unit in the game. At higher levels, people know how to counter it, and most people think the Dshk or the .50 cal is the far superior MG.

Now, having said that I do believe Axis are currently better than Allies, but I would caution about using statistics that include players who have little to no understanding of how the game works, which makes any argument about balance difficult.

If you think the new G43 Grens are bad I don't know what to tell you.

But the distinct identity is nonsense when OKW already got the Wehrmacht Tiger. Why is it OKW gets the Wehrmacht Tiger, but Wehrmacht does not get the King Tiger? Seems a bit unfair if you ask me.

Bit of a strange argument from Relic. Why does OKW get Wehrmacht units with stock Panzergrau and makeshift voice lines, but the one unit that would fit perfectly for Wehrmacht and isn't restricted due to voice lines and skins is somehow not allowed to be ported?

How is there an issue with giving it the stock Tiger voice lines (Sure, it doesn't use the word King, but who cares. It's a tiger) and the same Panzergrau?

I absolutely don't get their argument.

Absolutely do not buff those.