Profile of A_E

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID United Kingdom
Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6

General Information
Register Time: 18 Nov 2012, 19:26 PM
Last Visit Time: 21 Oct 2024, 21:25 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/AECoH
Website: http://reddit.com/r/CompanyOfHeroes
Twitter: http://twitter.com/AECoH
Youtube: http://youtube.com/AECoH
Residence:

United Kingdom
Nationality:

United Kingdom
Timezone: Europe/London
Game Name: A_E

Show Latest Posts


Thread: GCS2 Benefactor Tournament 15 Aug 2018, 18:05 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2018, 11:41 AMJae For Jett Was hoping for a less serious reply (my fault there). On that, I agree with everything you have said. Sorry dude, I'm in tourney organiser having to work after 9 hour days in stressful job mode all the time atm. All my responses are grouchy and my outlook defensive In: GCS Discussion
Thread: GCS2 Benefactor Tournament 14 Aug 2018, 06:53 AM Note: GB Pirate was affected by the double sign in bug for GCS2 qualifier players has been manually added. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: GCS2 Benefactor Tournament 14 Aug 2018, 06:48 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2018, 01:00 AMJae For Jett And you said I couldn't participate :'( I replied to GCS2 qualifier players that asked "GCS2 players wouldn't be allowed to play" this ended up meaning the eight players that have qualified to GCS2 itself. I was deliberately vague with players so as to ensure everyone fought their hardest for a chance to play in GCS2 itself and didn't focus on trying to win a GTX 1080 from the benefactor tourney. This was a wise decision and I stand by it. The best players that are now playing in this tournament are all large benefactors like momo and ciez who wanted to attend live. That said had you donated regardless of eligibility to compete to play in the benefactor tournament you would have received an email asking you to sign up to play in the Benefactor Tourney clarifying things, you did not so you did not. It's a pretty fair system when you think about it like that. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: GCS2 Benefactor Tournament 13 Aug 2018, 21:40 PM I am going to constantly make the joke that the Benefactor Tourney is ESL NA though as the top five seeds are Ciez, Momo, Redwings, Tomkaze and Lyconious you have been warned In: GCS Discussion
Thread: GCS2 Benefactor Tournament 13 Aug 2018, 21:28 PM 25 benefactors have entered into the GCS2 $40+ benefactor tournament for a chance to win a GTX 1080! It will be this Sunday at 14:00 BST. I will be casting on https://twitch.tv/AECoH The seeding has been done based on combined automatch rank of best Allies/Axis 1v1 faction https://gcs2.org/standings/players/benefactors (how it was calculated) The tourney will now only last one day! - The format will consist of a best of 1 for any match above round of 16, then best of three from there onward. (Note: If we get two GCS2 attendees in the final we may postpone the final until GCS2 itself) See you this Sunday! In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Relic is near bankruptcy (mod edit: allegedly)4 Aug 2018, 12:04 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2018, 10:52 AMValeran Ok, change title, sorry Hmm, I don't be able, may moderators change name to, "according to owler relic has extremely low revenque" or something like that? I have edited your title. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic is near bankruptcy (mod edit: allegedly)4 Aug 2018, 12:01 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2018, 10:32 AMValeran According to owler site, relic had Estimated Annual Revenue previous year is only $4.5M, that extremely low, it's lower than all salary of all relic employers, even if we calculate all averaged salary like one employer gets 70k $, if we calculate we will get 70000*205=14,35M $, and get fact that relix working in extreme lession, and in fact their revenque lower than averaged budget of game of AAA-class (18-24 M $). Maybe this is reason of all support problems of relic RTSes? P.S. I'm afraid very soon relic will be closure Sources: https://www.owler.com/company/relic https://www.glassdoor.com/Overview/Working-at-Relic-Entertainment-EI_IE533032.11,30.htm https://3dnews.ru/585840 You have a low level of understanding about how businesses within the computer game industry operate, I would urge you to stop offering people your opinion on this matter. In: Lobby
Thread: GCS2 seeding question31 Jul 2018, 05:41 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2018, 21:01 PMYossarian According to AE, GCS2 live tournament seeding is determined by the 8 players' win ratio. The following are the stats shown on AE's stream. DevM 11-0 Luvnest 21-5 VonIvan 28-10 VonAsten 20-10 Talisman 19-11 HelpingHans 13-8 Refero 17-11 Jesulin 16-13 I think the records for Luvnest, HelpingHans, Refero are 23-7, 13-9, 16-12 respectively. This does not change the ranking but incorrect data may cause problems in the future. Hey bro thank you for noticing this, I noticed myself whilst I revealed it. It's almost the act of revealing that made me realise that I made a few errors! It all got fixed though, cheers! (The seeding order remains) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 17:05 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 16:38 PMferwiner I must say I don't like the whole idea of forced, imitated competition. If organiser wants his tourney to be competitive, he should design the system so that people really want to play their matches. Even the 3rd place ones.. It was, the whole point of the third place best of three was to earn 3 more GCS2 points than your opponent. As you may have seen these points really do matter now, and are the difference between qualifying or not qualifying. However we have clearly had situations where players have not respected it as much as they could have done. So perhaps I should have made the gap between 4th and 3rd more pronounced like 5 points for fourth and 9 for third. But I didn't foresee as little appetite to play the 3rd place as there has been, a misjudgement on my part. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 15:40 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 14:59 PMsiddolio Berry juicy drama here. I think Stuve's original decision to ff/notplay because its not being casted is getting a really unfair swing. It would have been the only 3rd place game not to be casted and if I was him i would have felt like it was because it wasnt two of the big names and that he's not respected by the tourney officials. Just my two cents Reminds me of that big dota tourney where due to time pressures, it was announced the third place game would be cast later on. So one of the teams agreed to a new time but then forfeit without good reason instead of playing Oh wait that sounds ridiculous and would never happen. Let's not start pretending stuve did nothing wrong In: GCS Discussion