Profile of A_E

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID United Kingdom
Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6

General Information
Register Time: 18 Nov 2012, 19:26 PM
Last Visit Time: 21 Oct 2024, 21:25 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/AECoH
Website: http://reddit.com/r/CompanyOfHeroes
Twitter: http://twitter.com/AECoH
Youtube: http://youtube.com/AECoH
Residence:

United Kingdom
Nationality:

United Kingdom
Timezone: Europe/London
Game Name: A_E

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 14:54 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 14:32 PMShadowLinkX37 So unless this data has changed the -3 points here actually makes it so he cannot win via points unless something unintended occurs. Vonasten: 24 Vonivan 18 Jesulin 16 Talisman 15 Kimbo 10 Stuve 8 Refero 7 Aimstrong 5 Siddolio 4 Jove 4 J4J 3 Theo 3 This is before the 3 points are subtracted Kimbo is DQ’d and even if stuve gets 2nd place he won’t overtake talisman at 15 since he’ll only receive 9 and rise to 14. So basically this thread is just allowing him to play the 4th qualifier and if he wins he’ll go to the live event. There is no record of this on the discord. This data is outdated and your maths is incorrect. The refs talk on facebook group chat not in public. Your involvement as a referee has been rather minimal, for understandable reasons. I would urge you to do fact finding in private as you havnt got enough background and haven't been involved. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 12:19 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 12:13 PMblvckdream So the referee team came to the conclusion that it was too harsh or you individually? If you must know the refs/organisers voted 3 to 2. And then another messaged me saying they agreed with the decision after the vote. So 4-2. Very difficult decision though but I am confident that this is fair. Also struntigergadafi the guy you quoted, and I constructed an approach and agreement with stuve. So I wasn't the only person assessing the situation again. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 12:06 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 12:00 PMblvckdream This is what you said AE: Then I reassessed in the light of new information and mitigating factors that were not originally considered. We were too harsh with a full DQ and I feel this reassessing and conditional entry with penalties is fair. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 11:57 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 11:50 AMblvckdream Agree 100%. Not sure what has gotten into AE. So many sensible good decisions and then this. Why allow a guy back into your tournament after he made it obvious he doesn´t care whatsoever about the tournament, you as a organizer or all the people that donated? Makes no sense. The guy has had one very strict and harsh penalty removed and replaced with a very strict but slightly less harsh penalty and several conditions also. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 11:39 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 11:26 AMBartonPL i want details You are the last Pole standing. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 01:28 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 01:12 AMShadowLinkX37 DQing someone who opted to play PUBG because his game wasn’t being live casted seems fine to me. If your reason to play is being casted live and won’t play when you’re not seems like a massive insult to the people who put these things together. Who was consulted here for this decision? Doesn’t particularly matter now though. Going back on this decision would look awful. I suppose a few mitigating circumstances would help you understand why I even considered re-evaluating this decision, they're not all valid in my eyes but they are things to be considered: 1) Stuve was never directly told there could be penalties or issues if he refused to play. He thought of himself as 'forfeiting' and that as a valid option. I consider it non-competitive behaviour and awful but I've been running tournaments for years. For some of our players exposure to competitive events is low, and misunderstandings can happen. 2) There was less of a stage being shown that day to the third place match in not casting it, and after having a delay for the world cup final. We had valid reasons and had planned for all of this, but not everyone sees all the posts regarding the tournament, so it can still create an atmosphere of the third place match not mattering as much. 3) Stuve had been BM'd by Kimbo during the day, even after I instructed all players to respect one another, which set the mood for him. Just a mitigating circumstance. 4) Stuve had been constructive and apologetic when approached. 5) There were miscommunications that were as a result of being understaffed for referees on Day 1, that contributed to the lateness in the quarter final game. 6) The DQ was decided quite quickly, one day, without consulting all referees and organisers. If you want any detailed info just PM me. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 01:07 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 01:02 AMShadowLinkX37 Disagree entirely. This discredits our penalty system, refs, organizers and harms our benefactors. Actually the penalty system as written would indicate that an overall DQ is too harsh in this instance. I think we have shown we are more than capable of sticking to the letter of the rules we have laid out and are strong enough to ensure players play with respect and honesty. But there is strength in admitting when you have been too strict, and I think this is a case of that. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Stuve DQ reduced to points penalty and warning27 Jul 2018, 00:48 AM For context Stuve caused his quarter final match vs. VonIvan to be late, and also refused to play a 3rd place play off vs. Kimbo. This was unacceptable and after discussions resulted in a DQ. However in hindsight this was the first tournament where Stuve has been warned or penalised in such a fashion, and there were small mitigating circumstances that were not originally taken into account. Therefore there is a general idea that a full DQ is too harsh a penalty. As a result Stuve has been issued a -3 points deduction (as though he had only reached the quarter finals and not the match he forfeit). He has also acknowledged that he is on a final warning with regards to the rules etc. In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Kimbo DQd from GCS2 (conditional entry revoked)24 Jul 2018, 18:35 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2018, 18:31 PMMongal So is anything going to be put in place to stop other players from doing this? Kimbo was found out and banned but this doesnt mean other players wont be doing it on the sly. There has been suspicious play from other games where players destroying/dodging mines what were layed through fog of war. There is alot of money on the line so i wouldnt put it past people. Hey dude yeah sure, what you do is you get the eight best players and you put them on the the same equipment in isolation under observation in a studio at great expense. https://gcs2.org/ In: GCS Discussion
Thread: Poland vs. Russia 4v4 invitational showmatch (concept)24 Jul 2018, 18:25 PM This is an invitational showdown match as an olive branch to players that have fallen fowl of 'rules' etc or been the victim of geopolitics affecting their GCS2 entry. The proposal is simple: PL Poland: Barton, CaptainSPrice, Prodigily, Kimbo - or a Polish player of their choosing (three of these players are DQd from GCS for various reasons) vs. RU Russia: Noggano, Jove, Brosras, Quiritz - or a Russian player of their choosing (no Russian players can reliably attain a visa to come to England so can't play in GCS) To be played live this Saturday night 28th July following Day 1 of GCS2 Bagration. To be cast by Maza (Russian), and Tightrope (English). Winning team gets full national anthem played during GCS2 Bagration Day 2 stream in-front of 600 - 1000 people and full honours. In: GCS Discussion