Profile of BeastHunter

I think the greatest problem the current sturmtiger has is the abandon chance whenever it gets hit while reloading, if that could get removed it wouldn't lose its veterancy which is quite annoying even if the sturmtiger can get repaired, remanned and brought back into aciton after some lucky indirect fire hit it while it was reloading far beyond the front line with no follow up. If the abandon chance wouldn't be as high as it is, players could try to use the sturmtiger a bit more proacitve and fire and instantly start the reload on the frontline, while backing away (still with the speed debuff) and thus could fire more often potentially earn veterancy faster.
To the argument about damage against medium vehicles: it cannot onehit them currently but it still does 560 damage (compared to 440 from avre) on a direct rocket hit but the damage drops very fast off so usually the stun is the most interesting aspect in fights against enemy armor.
While it would be nice and probably fair to clean up a few inconsistencies between st and avre veterancy i think many of those could lead to a dominance of the sturmtiger so it would be nice if we could make it viable with some caution - while i fully agree with SweetrollNearTheDoor's findings and arguments i wouldn't want to hurry too many changes into a potential patch.

There are some maps where the lefh is strong in teamgames others where it only works to counter light arty pieces so it might be useful to plan accordingly on maps that lead to arty spam in the lategame lefhs and ml20s are easy to counter with recon + strong offmap arty drops if you are 1300h in i guess you know which work and which don't.
If you want to win and play competetive you might be forced to play a certain meta every game especially in teamgames with randoms where you might be forces to carry your team and watch out that their armies aren't getting hardcountered.
If you pick your commander just for fun please don't complain about not having fun if you are losing the game.

Some people seem to forget that the more poplar isu152 commander has the mark target option which increases the 240 damage to slightly above 320 with teh 35% damage boost - out of this stat we have a sweet 2 shot and a rather low time to kill vs medium tanks at 640 hp or a 960 hp panther all those vehicles might get buttoned if they are out of positions and guards are near by, surely the isu152 isn't amazing vs the heaviest tanks but with its 70 range and 240 damage compared to the su85 it is quite capable of fighting against armor.
It surely isn't amazing but it doesn't need to be as it has really good anti infantry capabilities while elefants or jts are useless on their own and need some tank or a lot of dedicated anti infantry firepower to stand on their own and don't get overrun by infantry or atguns.

the fhq doesn't connect the sectors for ressource gain or any other matters and the effect stays after the hq has been destroyed, but i am sure that it still is the soviet fhq that disturbs close the pocket it would be nice if this could be fixed but i suppose that won't happen.

Just remove it. Having the pintle upgrade is enough.
The aura and commander were probably put in when the mod team was over zealous in making a new unit.

Evidently both are op and not fair to have

Have you ever played the unit or tried it in cheatmode in different scenarios? ae you able to figure out on your won what would happen if the okw tiger lost its command aura?
In most cases it is a nerf unless you have about 40 - 50 popcap near your tiger that are able to counter whatever your tiger has troubles countering and is able to stand its ground near the tiger. The current problem of tigers especially with the commander upgrade is that it is able to counter allied defensive lines or at guns on its own whithout needing to back up. If the command aura would get removed it would most likely lead to blitzkrieg as vet1 ability which allows the tiger to escape easier or push into some tankdestroyers.

The tank commander is certainly strong and while the idea isn't too bad, certainly interesting it makes the tiger overperform.

I'd be glad if you could show me one piece of evidence where the okw tiger is evidently and consistently overperforming, but i suspect you might just have a case of slight bias to one side of this game.