Actually it would make a lot of sense to announce an overhaul like this in the next few weeks because that could possibly make some coh2 players stay instead of shifting to Wargame RD or MoW. |
What a stupid poll :/ The options should be somewhat neutral. |
Since there is a tank destroyer and AT gun that can 2-3 shot each and every armor from huge range, leaving no time to retreat.
and what am I supposed to do when I'm using a doctrine without Ele or 88mm ? It's ging to insta burn my whole army and unless I have a Panther or a lucky teller I'm not going to kill it given that both players have a smiliar army size. (1v1)
They just need to decrease the DPS, make it a croc Sherman copy, with KV armor.
The high armor value has already making this unit very useful. Ridiculous DPS is not necessary.
Agreed ! |
how about instead of posting a usless reply you watch the videos and realise you have no idea what you are talking about. You get a game severely downgraded and act as if nothing happened.
I play when I feel like it and im not the best player, but I have played both coh and coh 2 and I know coh2 feels nothing like the first game nor does it act in a manner that is shown in the videos.
As you can see a lot of the poeple that have watched more than 5 seconds of the videos agree with me if you want to be ignorant do it but dont cry to me about it
the "feeling" of a game is completely objective and can't be defined, so it doesn't prove shit
+1 TheCrimsonSpire |
Yes very funny.. still no good explanation as to why the beta version of the game not only looks, but runs faster, smoother and seemingly with none of the huge errors that plague it to this day - ie terrible inf combat, terrible rng, flame rng and one shot squad wipes, and my most hate issue non existant physics
Instead of posting nonsense in the forums go and play the game you're talking about lol
you're some random low skill player who thinks he can judge the game. Maybe you should take a look at the official forums there are tons of them. The issues you mentioned in this post have absolutely nothing to do with your stupid idea that there was a "different engine" in the beta. LOL what a load of ********, seriously. |
2 things - your experience with beta version of coh 2 has got f all to do with what I am saying. Not relevant at all to the discussion, neither is the improvements to the be beta to now. Why you may ask?
The reason is that just about everything in the game we have now to the vidoes I am talking about is different, the way vehicles move, the way terrain gets blasted, they way grenades and flame works, the way physics work,the planes that deliver ordnance, the way mp works,the way squad and unit health works and the animations for death of infantry, the way paks and tanks shoot are all different - its not just cosmetic, the way things interact with the game world is not the same. The amount of extra detail is quite marked, its much more coh like then what coh2 is like right now... and
Point 2 - if you can honestly watch the beta casts from dane (1-4 havent seen the rest) and come back here and say the game in those vidoes and the game we have now is built of the same engine then I just cant help you.
I guess you didn't play the beta version you're talking about ? (the earliest beta build)
The game was horrible at that time. Some of the points you just mentioned can't be judged just by watching a video. Why is my beta experience irrelvant ? This thread is just as bad as your "balance" threads lol (!!!MOLOTOVS OP!!!) |
Placebo effect , I played all the betas and they did not look better than the current build. |
Well, it depends.
While opening with T1 and going further for T2 and stall to call-ins is a viable choice, opening with T2 and back teching for T1 is completely pointless, no one will backtech to get a single unit(sniper) out of whole tier.
see that's what i meant I backtech for snipers pretty often, t1 does not cost a whole lot |
Good necro, but an interesting read none the less. T70 for SU76 swap would be interesting and could work.
Changing the fuel costs so you can go t1/t2 ---> t3 OR t4 would be good too.
It's no problem to go both t1 and t2 people just don't realise that vehicle rushes aren't the only avaible option |
So I exclusively playing Ostheer, still getting Soviet top 20, meaning what? MVGame
I've never said you're a bad player. However you're obviously an OH fan which is okay. I I prefer Ostheer as well. But it's illogical to say that your Soviet rank proves that Sovs are op. You could also say that all other Soviet players suck because Soviets are underperforming |