Profile of jagd wölfe

I used a couple in a 3v3 last night. It's just a very mediocre tank, I'd rather they increased the price and buffed it to make it stand out a bit more.

This.

But idk why we don't get a "premium medium" rework for Comet and Ez8

In light on the last changes to Walking Stuka the unit has issues against garrisons and buildings. It went from sure obliteration to being the worst anti building rocket artillery.

That is mainly due to the fact that the creeping barrage won't guarantee more than 1 hit at any range on a structure and is 100% sure to not give 3 hits even with the largest building.

Other people proposed to give it a normal barrage like it was in coh1. We have an example of how it would work with this (wonderful) mod about bringing coh1 in coh2.

https://youtu.be/BMTIE685m70

Btw do you guys think that the RE rifle nades are serving their anti garrison role well enough?

If not, there is the possibility of changes like setting the nade timer to 0 seconds, the dmg multiplier vs garrisons to something like 2.0 and the multiplier vs non-garrison targets to 0.25 (so there is no abuse)

Let's be real, unit would still just hop in/out, the only antigarrison thing in this doctrine is USF flame nade.

Uhm yes 47 degrees angled armor is better than 55 degrees angled armor. You even said yourself easy8 has 47 degrees sloped hull and that its better, so how excatly "that's not even true in the slightest way"?

EDIT: There was no overmatching for puma versus sherman front armor, as it was 51mm thick. Maybe learn what overmatching is.

"Uhm yes 47 degrees angled armor is better than 55 degrees angled armor."

No, sloping is accounted as angle from the vertical axis, the higher number the better.
That's why Tiger and Comet are accounted as close to 0 sloping
This is fu#!ing basics lmao.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_Sherman

"The Sherman's glacis plate was originally 50.8 mm (2.00 in) thick and angled at 56 degrees from the vertical, providing an effective thickness of 90.8 mm "

"Later Shermans had an upgraded glacis plate that was uniformly 63.5 mm (2.50 in) thick and sloped at 47 degrees from the vertical, providing an effective thickness of 93.1 mm (3.67 in) over the entire plate."

"EDIT: There was no overmatching for puma versus sherman front armor, as it was 51mm thick. Maybe learn what overmatching is."

http://afvdb.50megs.com/usa/m4sherman.html

"Starting in late 1943 at the Fisher Tank Arsenal, the 56° glacis on the M4A2 was replaced by a single-piece plate inclined at 47° from vertical."

The pre 1944 hull glacis was two pieces of armor casted togheter, 30 + 21mm, 50mm did overmatch M4a2 and M4a1

Kwk39 APC penetration at 450-500ms is 79-80 mm, and it did penetrate m4a2 hull despite its effective protection was 91mm because of overmatching.

So yeah, maybe YOU learn how sloping is accounted for and how armor works

The Easy 8 had better armor values with improved sloping at 47 degrees in addition to new suspension system. It fits the theme much better than calliope which was never used in urban combat.

That's not even true in the slightest way.

M4A3 all have 47 degrees sloped hull if produced after 1943, and it wasn't "better sloping", it was actually less sloped but a unique piece glacis compared to 50 degrees sloped 2 piece front plate glacis. It was better because it denied Puma and Panzer 3 50mm overmatching.