Profile of thekingsown10

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 232

General Information


Thread: Jackson Nerf vs Making Panther Doctrinal2 Nov 2019, 12:37 PM The panther should be doctrinal and the tiger should be stock tier 4 . In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar OP plz nerf!!!!20 Oct 2019, 21:59 PM Brummbar is slow as hell , expensive , has no turret, laughable range, gets stuck all the time , it will miss a shed load of shots due to awful tracking , long load time and inconsistent damage. The american M8A1 motor carridge is better than a Brummbar in nearly all ways with massive range and damage for a far cheaper cost.. so yeah .. go figure.. The Brummbar needs its old range back with tracking and damage profile improved . In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 09:34 AM The Pak 40 and Stug should certainly have more penetration In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How is Wehr static faction design now?11 Oct 2019, 08:40 AM Some good ideas here , but grenadiers should be able to build sandbags at stock from the get go. Ostwind is okay unless there is something on the map blocking it in which case every single round will colide with terrain and deal no damage whatsoever. The MG42 should be the dominant stock mg in the game but its not. It would be plausible to increase its tracking speed as well as a minor damage buff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [WER]ALL OSTWIND PERFORMANCE8 Oct 2019, 12:35 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Oct 2019, 02:06 AMfrostbite even if a ostwind hits cover while attacking a unit they still will take some dmg. they shoot to fast imo It really depends and there are MANY MANY times when the Ostwind in certain positions will not score a single hit and do no damage no matter how many shots you try. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [WER]ALL OSTWIND PERFORMANCE6 Oct 2019, 15:10 PM You utterly forget that the ostwind rounds colide with anything and everything. There are many situations where the ostwind will not land a single hit because of terrain . The centaur does not have this problem... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I know why MG42 is underperforming much5 Oct 2019, 21:08 PM The Mg42 could really do with faster target acquisition and a slight damage buff with a cost increase to 270 manpower. This should help compensate for the ultra lacklustre grenadiers. The Mg42 should be hands down the best stock MG in the game by a considerable margin but its not. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Grens UP & G43s suck3 Oct 2019, 11:23 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2019, 11:18 AMachpawel It's just names for one thing - they get boosts in cover and are very potent out of it too. They can bolster without a doctrine, get lots of different weapons including at etc. ... and build sandbags. I thought it was hilarious when people were saying IS got penalities outside cover yet they still utterly wrecked axis infantry even without it. The bonus is just icing on the cake . In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Grens UP & G43s suck3 Oct 2019, 10:13 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2019, 10:11 AMoootto92 I think that none of the mainline infantry should be able to build sandbags/cover unless it's a commander feature. That should be left for pios and engineers. That's another option , anything is better than the one sided matchups we have now to be honest. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Grens UP & G43s suck3 Oct 2019, 10:11 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2019, 10:09 AMachpawel +1 (and especially after the arrival of Brits) Brits can build sandbags instantly and are much more powerful xD In: COH2 Balance