Profile of blvckdream

Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2019, 10:53 AMKatitof

"Last thing" implies last change. It can be 10 minutes, it can be 10 years. Learn English finally.

That traverse change made the ability from infantry eraser to mild annoyance.
Cost was reduced so anyone would still want to use it - no one did since.

Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 22:15 PMgbem

the JP4 can counter the churchill pretty well as it isnt that well armored... its just very beefy... it struggles against the IS-2/ISU but thats doctrinal

isnt the IS-2 doctrinal aswell?

Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 18:25 PMSully

I would much rather have the JP4 reliably penetrate allied heavies than have a higher ROF over other TDs. I rarely if ever feel it is a better option to go JP4 vs allied mediums over a P4 that has a similar cost/timing and the ability to combat infantry.

Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2019, 16:56 PMSander93

Out of curiosity, any proof (a good amount of personal experience playing 2v2s counts) for that? Because I play UKF in 3v3s and they are still very strong in team games. I personally haven't really noticed a difference since the patch (quite the opposite actually, as their lategame got a pretty decent buff because Comets are good now) except I'll have to get Brens a bit more often. I still see plenty of UKF players in 3v3s.