Except that is only you saying that...any other user here knows how trashy raketenwerfer is.
No atg miss units like that...not even close.
With extreme low target size..misses may occurr rarely on tergets at the bottom of the atg arc.
The most ridicolous parts is that there isn't such thing as "moving target" at all, accuracy is affected only by the mivement if the unit that is firing...but i DO LOVE how you try so hard (failing) to make it look like you actually have a grasp of basic vehicle/at mechanics of this game.
Putting raketen in building deny cloak and the atg fires on infantry wasting shots, same for sturm shreck...300 mp for something as pathetic as a single shreck squad is ridicolous...
the claim that tools as snares and mines that other factions don't lack should fill the gap (which has no reason to exist to begin with), that sturmshreck is of any use, that raketen garrison is underappreciated (lol), that vehicles are somewhat harder to hit when moving...are ridicolous and only show how short sighted you are with your 2500 4vs4 rank with just 18 matches in.
The real question is why a 2500 rank player feels the need of spreading misinformation based on wrong stats and make pretentious and laughable claims.
dude raketenwerfer isn't trashy. it has lots of 'special' abilities that makes it a good atgun. IMO i hate coming up to raketens cause you 'never' know where they are and how many there are. you can cloak up and get close to enemy tanks and killing them in 2shot (2raketens), unless you have 4 then it's ez xD. okw is in a good state. it isn't really that OP anymore as before. okw still has some flaws but they have decreased hardly. and if the raketenwerfer was so bad, then why do you guys only come up with that now? it has been like that for a long time. if this is what makes okw so bad, then you are the guy that makes the laughable claims. okw is mostly perfectly balanced.