I'm not holding bias in this case since I stated I play soviets and can trump this early game easily with penals and Clowncar, even an unfair for OKW early, maybe. But you just draw conclusions and take stuff out of context or fail to comprehend what youve just read and it makes me question your IQ. Also, you're an OKW main and biased yet you're just trying to insult me while still agreeing OKW dominates early game especially against UKF and USF making the game unfair and unfun for them, especially when NEW to the game. really makes you think
U only think I am biased because I said KT should be nerfed or made IS-2 t4 then without proper arguments against it except "w-well its slow ! haha got em". And I'm just left here wondering why sturms are still so strong and powerful when OKW design isnt what it used to be with low resources?
And I'm not a him/her, address me properly.
You always hold bias. I've never seen you think objectivly. I've asked
MULTIPLE people to
PROVE to me of my bias when they claimed I was, and I received
ZERO attempts from any of them. You're more than welcome to prove me wrong. FYI though, playercard doesn't prove bias, unsupported opinions and suggestions do.
Furthermore since you're a PhD you should be able to see why Axis winrates are skewed in GCS instead of coping out everytime someone brings up a counter arguement using GCS, but it's all fine and dandy when USF/UKF use their GCS winrates right?
Good to know you're not a him/her, i'll now address you as "it".