Profile of Cresc

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 378

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/crescent_bretzel
Steam: 76561198162641695


Thread: T0 Grenadier or MG 42?9 Jan 2017, 11:16 AM Learn to play issue, try to understand how each faction is designed and there is no real difference between teching up to get your mainline infantry and getting it from tier 0. This is how the game is fundamentally designed with the vanilla faction. Soviet starts with offensive capability, Ostheer with defensive. I don't see how you lose map control, I can show you games where you can just spam MG42 and skip tier 1... And if you do this you will also render assault grens and ostruppen a bit useless or late. The only threat to Ostheer defensive play is the USF mortar, it needs to get either removed or nerfed for good. good change; please close thread now or give vipper and kingdun a private forum In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.4 Update9 Jan 2017, 10:53 AM I didn't say it is confusing, it is complicating things for a design that should be simple : Penals = AI unit. Sorry but all this story about percentage of hit chance, and damage depending on what type of vehicle you target and a possible 3rd PTRS you get once you upgrade to tier 4... this is just non sense. There is no need for AT tools in Tier 1, simple as that, and even there is such need, at least add a viable option. As Australian Magic and many others said, it's only making conscripts even worse than they already are, there is absolutely no reason to pick them other than time saving and a vehicle snare you need to upgrade to as well. What I do find confusing is that they let somebody who has barely any 1v1 experience be in charge of balancing the game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.4 Update9 Jan 2017, 10:39 AM Remove PTRS from penals the changes and complicated system you implemented with it is absurd. Leaving it at an AT satchel upgrade seems fine to me. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Once more conspam into M4C4 Jan 2017, 14:06 PM Vs unknown legend In: Replays
Thread: 18 minutes conspam4 Jan 2017, 13:28 PM Fast domination, big pressure imposed by the underperforming conscripts. In: Replays
Thread: Fierce conspam vs Unknown Legend4 Jan 2017, 13:18 PM Harsh offensive play with conscripts, the buff is overdue In: Replays
Thread: Conscript Upgrade Concept26 Dec 2016, 03:30 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2016, 01:39 AMMr. Someguy A lot of detractors here have valid points, even though I disagree. This is not a valid point though. No faction should have a core unit that is 'designed to fail' so to speak. Core units like Infantry must remain relevant through the entire game. They are not designed to fail, it is your misconception of what purpose they serve and it's not only conscripts. This debate existed even when the game was just out and it didn't change until now, there is a reason to that and this is because Soviets were designed like this. Like I said, they just need to revert the nerf, they were very good before. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why the flamer HT is not addressed in WBP?26 Dec 2016, 03:27 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2016, 01:34 AMskemshead allies is around 1235 as opposed to around 317 for axis. It is reasonable to say you favour Allies. It doesn't matter, you said "only a few axis games", as I said, the number of games is still there and the I 'm better ranked with OKW than I'm with Soviets, I don't favor any side in particular, this is just your opinion. Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2016, 01:34 AMskemshead My point was and still is, that the people supporting the OP's position are pro allies. That still remains unequivocally true and nothing you say changes that fact. It doesn't, as I said, it's your opinion, and as always it's always coming from those who have no playercard to show. Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2016, 01:34 AMskemshead Lastly, I think your claim that you exposed me as a retard needs a lot more work I said said that it's only good at exposing yourself as a retard, not that you're one or I exposed you. Seeing how you still fail at comprehension read properly, it's safe to assume you are. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why the flamer HT is not addressed in WBP?26 Dec 2016, 00:53 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2016, 08:20 AMskemshead Let me explain it for you. The OP's in game name is "Axis=OP+Retarded Player Choice". Its a bit like turning up to a human rights rally with a shirt that says "I hate niggers" and expecting to be taken seriously. Most people that are ranting in this post are Allied fanboys that either have a history of anti axis posts or have few axis games under their belt. If the flame halftrack was that batshit op then they would appear in every game, on streams and in tournaments, which they do not. Complain all you want ZeroCoh, your taken about as serious as "aaa". Sorry to disapoint you, but many other players agree that the flame HT is op. And you can check my stats, I'm as well ranked with axis as I rank with allies. It's not really a good way to prove your point, about claiming one is a fanboy, it's good to expose you as a retard. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Upgrade Concept26 Dec 2016, 00:40 AM Conscripts don't need any sort of upgrade, that's how they were designed to be, always depend on the doctrine choice and inferior scaling in late game. They just need to revert the nerf they made on their accuracy and dps after all the axis fanboys whined about conspamming being "too effective". Same thing with molotov, revert the nerf on the throw speed, that stupid conscript dance is annoying. In: COH2 Gameplay