Profile of Cresc

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 378

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/crescent_bretzel
Steam: 76561198162641695


Thread: Why the flamer HT is not addressed in WBP?25 Dec 2016, 06:56 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2016, 05:08 AMzerocoh One way of easily making the unit less more retardedly strong is removing one of it's guns. Why does this particular unit gets TWO flamers while everyone else have one? and to all the retards saying "j-j-just stay away!11!" well, you can't, because for some reason the flames "supress" all infantry (they hit the dirt or run around looking for cover) every time they get hit by flames making them unresponsive, just like the old guards dance bug. Reduce the DPS, slightly, problem solved. Also I think the damage it does on garrisoned units is actually a bug. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why the flamer HT is not addressed in WBP?25 Dec 2016, 00:57 AM I'm with you on this OP, but apparently the naziboos in this board are still arguing out of reason. A nerf is overdue for this unit, and no it has nothing to do with it being weak. Relic already said that they felt flaming vehicles are overperforming and adjusted them all in consequence. I think that as incompetent as they are they just forgot about the Flame HT. 1- It instawipes squads in garrisons 2- It does a crazy amount of damage to AT-guns and AT inf, what I mean by that, is killing a Flame HT with your team weapons or infantry demand that you blob around it. 3- It gets veterancy too fast. Actually that one is just the blatant proof that it is overperforming, considering how many kills it needs to get vet 3. If it gets them that fast it is because they kill fast. And you can witness this in every game where it is used. But, I already know what the wehr fanboys around here will say... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter Balance Patch: Wrong Direction?26 Nov 2016, 12:11 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2016, 11:53 AMskemshead Perhaps you should calm down and try to understand what is being written. I said sov is one of the strongest factions. Not the strongest. This is hardly a disputed fact by intelligent adults. You say you don't give 2 fucks about his cast but you respect him. Lol. Imbicile. He spent an hour talking through the changes and the stats and thinking involved. I am sure you can find my card if you want. As to your card, soviets are clearly your most favoured faction by a large margin. As to why they can only change certain units, well that was the direction from relic. If you want more details maybe ask the mods or not. I don't really care. Whatever, just go get some games in 1v1, learn to play and post your player card when you can show something convincing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter Balance Patch: Wrong Direction?26 Nov 2016, 11:34 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2016, 11:29 AMskemshead You did read the part where they are only allowed to change certain units. Try watching Generals Gentlemans cast. Guards are hardly nerfed to the point of useless. Also soviets have long been considered one of the strongest faction. Most players except the die hard fanboys acknowledge that. Why? Why are they allowed to change certain units? Enlighten me genius. I couldn't give two f**** about GG's cast, no offense to him, I respect his opinion, but Guards are beyond useless now. There was a time where they had the stats you see in this patch, and they got buffed, now they got nerfed AGAIN, thanks to crybabies like you who don't even show their Player Card, yet call those who don't share their biased opinion "die hard fanboys". They were good, they just needed to fix Penals and Maxim spam, adjust conscripts and their Heavy-Tank. BUT SOMEHOW Guards are op. My player card is here, see how much of a soviet fanboy I am, and Soviets are far from being the strongest faction. Since you're ballsy enough to call others die hard fanboys, let's see your player card In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter Balance Patch: Wrong Direction?26 Nov 2016, 10:18 AM I don't see how Penals are getting overnerfed, their adjustment is fine. T-70 has been nerfed for all the wrong reasons, but I see that they are adjusting all other light vehicles in consequence, so it's alright too. The only units getting overnerfed are Guards, they were just fine and working good so far, until one faggot started whining that they are op and now what? They get nerfed beyond useless. Nerf the PTRS again? Add an aim delay? AOE "adjusted? And past that, there are still no changes for Conscripts, Maxim, 82mm (getting more nerf actually), ISU-152, and Shocktroops. Get fucking real. I've said before, but coincidentally it's always the same people getting a fair arrangement on their part. Who were the only few who said that Soviets are the best faction in the game and that guards are op? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to counter USF blobbing 223 Nov 2016, 13:07 PM This time with 2xLMG abuse. In: Replays
Thread: How to counter USF blobbing23 Nov 2016, 12:44 PM In: Replays
Thread: How to fix: OKW23 Nov 2016, 12:16 PM Most of these options are really not worth it, and the "put MG34 in tier 0" is the worst of all, I keep hearing this one a lot, I don't know what it is about that makes people think OKW needs an early HMG. In my opinion, this comes mostly from players who skip medtruck to get an early luchs. Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2016, 05:12 AMUlaire Minya Ho about we fix Forward Retreat Point cancer first. Blobbing around your titanium truck should be punished. not encouraged. Actually, if you know what you're up against, retreat forward point is also a weakness. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: TMC Round 1 Game 1 Crescent vs. Prime22 Oct 2016, 14:27 PM GG. Well played. In: Replays
Thread: 888 strat, against USF16 Oct 2016, 17:41 PM the 222 matching its cost. In: Replays