Profile of Cresc

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 378

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/crescent_bretzel
Steam: 76561198162641695


Thread: State of the Soviets12 Dec 2019, 20:56 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2019, 20:51 PMelchino7 State of the Soviets T3485s received an indirect buff which they never deserved, the MG buff, which was meant for the T3476. If aint broken, don't touch it. If something needs to be done, you can just make a new MG profile mirroring it's old dmg stats. The old dmg stats is that there was no dmg stats. It didn't get an indirect buff, a bug was preventing the coaxial mgs from shooting. T34/85 costs 380/130 and is doctrinal, does this ever come into consideration? How about we discuss the scatter rate on the main gun? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: wehrmacht buff opinions12 Dec 2019, 20:24 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2019, 15:51 PMVipper No, other infantries need be toned down No, LV need to have less shock value No, TD simply need to be less effective (accurate/ROF) at max range Buffing faction after faction needs to stop, units need to nerfed not buffed. What you seem to not understand or ignore, you and many others, is that the LVs you see right now ARE ALREADY TONED DOWN, and these nerfs have hit them through several patches, not just one, except for the t70, that only had its recon ability nerfed after they already adjusted it's firepower. And people still complain, again and again. Ostheer used to dominate the LVs game once, that's why today it doesn't have anything that used to be abused in every match you saw. The infamous puma+flametrack for instance has been rendered unviable for a reason, despite the countless complaints about puma being useless(although true). You tone down the other LVs until what? Why not just remove them entirely? If that's a good option I'm all for it, but knowing Relic I doubt they will agree to remove any units for the sake of variety as they love to say in patch notes. Stug buffs are debatable, but the panzer 4 is not on par with the rest of the other medium tanks, that work as intended, if you think the other med tanks need to be toned down, can you clarify which ones and what needs to be nerfed? Don't you think it would be easier to simply make the panzer 4 a good equivalent instead of creating another balance mess by toning down every other tank? Also, last patch had nothing but buffs for ostheer that's all the irony. Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2019, 17:29 PMSunTzu If you don't mind, can you leave me the link? It's not only one thread, these discussions are everywhere, the balance team is aware of Ostheer struggles. Most feedbacks are too biased or plain wrong though, the problem is that since the average player heard a few professionals say that ostheer might be the weakest, they keep blaming every loss on the faction and point out stuff that don't need to be adjusted. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF med truck needs to be replaced12 Dec 2019, 19:43 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2019, 19:31 PMWiderstreit Where was the inf with at-nade? Why was the PaK not placed earlier? Your enemys were noobs. I assume you have a player card to show your credentials on that matter? Otherwise I agree with your statement, actually where was even the swarm of shermans? Where was the pershing? Where were the 57mm(not a pak) not already placed, in numbers and ready to counter any diving panther? Where is the VP control? Wy was there no instant win button from their part ? Clearly they suck, they make so many mistakes, gosh, I myself can micro every single unit in a micro second and predict every single move my opponent does thanks to my 500IQ, the others need to adapt, clearly they are noobs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: wehrmacht buff opinions12 Dec 2019, 15:41 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2019, 15:00 PMFarlion People who don't play the game but still post about balance. Or people who literally play only one faction but think they can talk about the factions they never played... Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2019, 11:40 AMSunTzu Hi in the old post I realized that OST needs a buff and many agree (just play the Soviets to understand). In your opinion, what are the main problems of OST? What are the buffs that OST needs? This has been discussed many times, another thread isn't necessary... Ostheer needs solid grenadiers, better tools to hold itself during the LVs phase, and an improved panzer 4. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Maxim Sustained Fire11 Dec 2019, 19:38 PM Why does it need an ability to perform correctly? And a vet 1 locked that costs munitions no less... I'm pretty confused by what I read so far, some guys here actually think the maxim serves any purpose in 1v1 other than getting wiped? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to play Ost vs Soviet right now? 10 Dec 2019, 13:25 PM Zis barrage and 7 men cons are pretty annoying, not sure what to tell you. Don't do the mistake of not getting grens as many seem to do lately, also you can't go wrong by having up to 2 pgren squads in your build. The best you can hope is to not let him get any IS2 or delay it, I found lately that the 81mm does a great job against 7 men cons, I wonder why it's not used that often. Early game your entire plan is to not let him get blob on your cutoff or pressure you with his infantry. Ostheer best plan right now is to baselock your opponent, you can help yourself with ostruppen as an alternative to grens, this way you can get numerous infantry squads around his cutoff/base and have your mg42 lock him. In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: Tank hunter doctrine underpowered9 Dec 2019, 22:22 PM I'm not sure Tank Hunter is underpowered, just out of meta, but it's definitely good enough. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF med truck needs to be replaced7 Dec 2019, 16:46 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2019, 11:16 AMSander93 In 1v1s yes, but in 3v3s/4v4s an early forward ambulance to hold one part of the map (with teammates) is incredibly powerful, borderline overpowered even, which is the reason any straight durability buffs were discarded. We looked at the alternative base layout to help protect it, but that was not deemed viable for Relic to implement, and we looked at giving the ambu a lock down mode for main base sectors so it could have increased durability only there, but couldn't find a simple way to do so. It's simply not fit for 1v1 play. I'm sorry but it happens in every single game I had for the past hours, and one could argue that I or many others are doing something wrong. But then you watch WCS matches and the same thing happens. They simply don't care they know they can get in, kill the med truck in or 3 shots (if you use a ostwind for instance) and leave. It's stupidly easy and unbalanced. Then you start losing every engagement because USF depends heavily on its infantry. I'm somewhat relieved to know that the balancce team at least looked onto it, but the problem is still here. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF med truck needs to be replaced7 Dec 2019, 02:31 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2019, 02:29 AMthedarkarmadillo The enemy diving into your base because they know you don't have a counter because you have elected to not produce a counter is not a balance issue. Ok, I think you are trolling, you keep missing the point. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF med truck needs to be replaced7 Dec 2019, 00:57 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 23:33 PMKatitof Umm.......... because you HAVE TO REBUILD that ambulance, making you spend 500mp and 20fu on healing alone in total, while 222 is not going to be rebuild and it already most likely had some kills on infantry, more then paying for itself? Also, possible additional attrition due to temporary lack of healing? For someone pretending to be so extremely smart about CoH stuff, you really can't see obvious stuff. It's ALL about the attrition. No healing = infantry bleeds more = lose more engagement = lose map control = bleed more mp trying to reinforce them(if you have any) It's the same with any other faction. In: COH2 Balance